The truth about Salesforce Enterprise License Agreements (SELA)...is it right for you?

We’ve found that the average savings potential for a company switching from a Salesforce Enterprise License Agreement (SELA) to a standard Salesforce Subscription Agreement is 41.3%.
Yet many large enterprises still honor their SELA agreements simply “because we’ve always had one.” Subsequently, these companies have a difficult time benchmarking the value they’re extracting from a SELA vs any other contracting method.
While Salesforce will present these agreements in a way that may seem extremely advantageous to the customer, the truth is they’re rarely a good fit.In this article we are going to explain:
- What is a SELA Agreement?
- How SELA’s looked in the early days of Salesforce
- How present day SELA’s have changed
- Why SELA Agreements are a bad idea for most companies
- Problem 1: SELA caps are built off of your current needs
- Problem 2: SELA agreements are manipulated by Salesforce’s changing product line
- Problem 3: You are paying 41.3% more than you should be with a SELA Agreement
- When SELA’s work
- When SELA’s don’t work
- Why “you don’t have to manage it” rarely justifies a SELA
- What to do if you have a SELA
What is a SELA Agreement?
A SELA Agreement is a Salesforce Enterprise License Agreement.
What is the difference between a Salesforce Enterprise License Agreement (SELA) and a Salesforce Subscription agreement?
A Salesforce Enterprise License Agreement (SELA) agreement is different from a Salesforce Subscription Agreement in one key way. A SELA is meant to provide “Unlimited Access” to the platform, while a standard Salesforce Subscription Agreement includes set prices for a set number of products.
Yet while SELA began as an “Unlimited Access” promise, that is not quite what SELA agreements look like today.
To understand SELA’s and why your company probably doesn’t need one, it’s helpful to understand the history of SELA’s and how they may have looked when your company originally signed one.
How SELA’s looked in the early days of Salesforce
In the early days of Salesforce, there was a massive focus on market penetration. Like any typical SaaS company, all they cared about was volume.
In the early days of Salesforce, the CRM market was extremely fragmented with small players and disparate homegrown solutions. Arguably, at the beginning, the largest competitor to Salesforce was Microsoft Excel. As a result, Salesforce hit the market precisely at the right time and acquired new customers relatively easily.
But given that Salesforce was in such a high-growth mode, they wanted to leverage their existing client base to grow organically both internally and externally at the client organization. In other words, they wanted to pursue any strategy that enabled new endpoints whenever, and wherever, possible.
Under this premise, they created the first SELA which conceptually provided unlimited access to the platform. This would ensure that Salesforce could land and expand as fast as possible within a new account without any barriers, paperwork, governance, or red tape.
The MO of an early SELA deal summarized would be:
Your contract with Salesforce is $10M per year over a 5 year contract term. It is a $50M relationship, and you can use the entire Salesforce platform however you see fit, no restrictions. Use our support as you need it. Our goal is to help you grow.
This unlimited access approach was the foundation for Salesforce’s growth by 100x in the early years. By signing one of these deals, and then expanding into a large enterprise organization, they were able to show massive growth rates on all of the SaaS growth metrics such as users, retention, growth rate, turnover rate, etc.
Because they were signing customers onto SELA’s, their growth metrics went through the roof which gave all of the signals for additional funding, press, and market share.
The goal of SELA in the early days was simple. Achieve as much penetration as possible into the corporate world.
How present day SELA’s have changed
While SELA’s once provided “Unlimited Access” to the platform, that isn’t always the case today. Present day SELA agreements look quite different.
Today’s SELA Agreements are full of floors and caps on the quantity of specific product sets that you can use. While old agreements were “Unlimited”, the new agreements come with added restrictions, usage ceilings, and massive financial growth commitments.
When your organization grows/declines past the commercially allowed threshold within your specific SELA, there will be significant financial consequences. Subsequently, without the proper legal terms and conditions protecting you from changes within your business, you are setting yourself up for significant financial and legal risk.
Why a SELA is a bad idea for most companies
A floor/cap on your product usage initially may not sound like a large risk for your company, especially if you are comfortably within the allowed threshold at the time of contract execution. That being said, there are 3 major problems that commonly arise from this scenario. Here we are going to dive into the three fundamental problems:
Problem 1: SELA caps are built based on your current needs
A SELA agreement will often be on a 3-5 year term, and the caps are negotiated based on the needs of your organization at the signing of the contract. This may not sound like a major risk, but for high volatility (growth and/or decline) companies, or anyone in an active M&A industry, this can be a major issue.
When you break the caps of your SELA Agreement, it’s not as simple as “buying extra licenses” to make up the gap. Instead, it will trigger an entire sales event with Salesforce that is going to have them coming back to you for more money.
Additionally, you may only trigger your cap in one single product category (Ex. Pardot), but if you break your SELA caps in that space, they can use that as grounds to raise prices across the board.
These caps are dangerous because as soon as you break one, it puts the power of the contract back into Salesforce’s hands.
Problem 2: SELA Agreements are manipulated by Salesforce’s changing product line
The second problem with a modern day SELA is the ever-changing product line from Salesforce.
Salesforce is a master of releasing and repackaging products. They are constantly rolling out new products into the market, as well as repackaging existing products, while retiring old products.
While innovation at Salesforce is great, the new products and services that are organically (or inorganically) created are rarely contemplated as part of your organization’s SELA. If your organization wants to use those new products and/or services, they will likely need to be paid for separately as an additional expense.
Additionally, some products may “retire” or become a “carveout” of an existing product. Continued usage of these products may actually trigger a contractual breach of your SELA.
This sounds ridiculous, but Salesforce does it all of the time, and it’s very expensive for the client. Naturally, most Salesforce clients are not aware of these inherent risks until they’re sent an invoice for this incremental out of compliance usage.
Here is a recent practical example of how they pull this off...
Repackaging Example: Sales & Service Cloud
Up until recently, Sales Cloud & Service Cloud were two separate products from Salesforce.
Sales Cloud was for Sales Reps while Service Cloud was for service department technicians. These two products came at two different price points. Sales Cloud was cheaper, and Service Cloud was more expensive.
Eventually, Salesforce decided to roll these into “Sales and Service Cloud” as a single commercial product even though they technically operate as separate infrastructures (clouds). This provided Salesforce a commercial opportunity to financially uplift those existing clients that had both products (Sales and Service Cloud), historically with two different price points, now as a single price point that matched the more expensive line item as part of Customer 360. The logic being that both clouds are integrated harmoniously whereas the entire client organization is able to review all of its omnichannel touchpoints with their customers. This “additional value” was largely the basis for this product and price convergence.
The targeted outcome is typically around a 30% revenue boost within the existing customer base. This revenue boost was predicated by a simple repackaging of services.
Problem 3: You are likely paying 41.3% more than you should be with SELA
We renegotiate a lot of SELA deals at The Negotiator Guru (TNG), and on average, we identify a 41.3% cost reduction opportunity when switching to a standard Salesforce Subscription Agreement.
The reason behind this is that most SELA’s are priced extremely high (on a price per unit, per month basis) and commit the client to much higher usage (products & quantities) than is actually being used, creating conceptual shelfware.
At TNG, we leverage a proprietary Right Size, Right Price approach to drive efficient and long lasting savings for our clients.
We first understand what your organization actually needs and build a roadmap to support you based on your specific global business. Instead of buying everything through a SELA Agreement, we leverage our Right Size framework to ensure you’re leveraging the appropriate products and services at the Right Price.
We are able to easily identify Right Price information based on our industry leading price benchmarking database that is minimally rationalized based on your Annual Contract Value, Industry, and Company Size. We say “minimally” because there are other factors that determine product pricing such as product mix, your roadmap, Salesforce quarterly interests, etc.
Then, we leverage our unmatched expertise negotiating with Salesforce either as a covert silent advisor, or an overt legal agent, to extract maximum value for you at the lowest possible cost.
Those two simple components alone have generated our SELA Agreement customers 41.3% in savings.
We’ve worked with Fortune 100 companies paying $25M+ per year to Salesforce whose actual contract value should have only been $10M.
The savings potential is real and worth the time to renegotiate.
When a SELA is a good idea
Most of this article is spent sharing why SELA’s are a bad idea for most clients. That being said, there are a few select cases where they may be temporarily beneficial to a client.
Every year, we speak with hundreds of Salesforce Customers. Since the inception of TNG in 2015, we have only had one customer where a SELA was actually a good fit for their needs.
While we always keep our clients confidential, this specific company was a high-growth IT firm with rapid-growth aspirations (500x), large amounts of equity funding, minimal IT resources, and a technical architecture that required Salesforce to act as the backbone for their outreach strategy. They were in a very unique situation.
Here are the required conditions to even consider a SELA:
- High-Growth Environment of 10x-500x per year;
- High-amounts of capital investment;
- A large volume of customers with varying interaction levels across multiple channels; or,
- A clear architectural roadmap from a digital capability and functionality perspective.
When a SELA is a bad idea
99% of the time, a modern day SELA Agreement is a bad idea. In almost all cases, it just doesn’t make sense.
Here are (only some of) the conditions where a SELA does not work:
- You signed a SELA 4+ years ago;
- Your company has predictable needs in both products and quantities;
- Your company is spending less than $10.75M/year on Salesforce;
- You have less than 5,000 API connections per day;
- Your IT department’s strategy is to leverage native (vs. custom) functionality wherever possible;
- You have less than 3,500 Sales and/or Service Cloud licenses; or,
- You’re not sure where your business is going in the next 3-5 years.
Why “you don’t have to manage it” rarely justifies a SELA
Yet, even with everything we shared, many companies still sign up for new, or keep renewing their existing, SELAs. Perhaps that’s because they haven’t read this article!
The most common reason we hear from our clients on why they have a SELA is that “We don’t have to manage it. There are no order forms, compliance, or governance. We just signed the deal and originally, didn’t have to worry about it.”
While that is great in theory, you can achieve nearly the same benefits with a standard Salesforce Subscription Agreement by negotiating specific terms and conditions into your Order Forms. We will share two of these terms below for your awareness and utilization:
M&A Language
Request language be added to your Order Forms that protects you in the event of an extraordinary corporate event like Merger and Acquisition (M&A) Activity. Adding in the appropriate language for M&A activity can provide huge benefits to your organization. Specifically, ensuring that an acquisition or divestiture can be brought in or taken out of your environment without commercial recourse will proactively avoid painful legal headaches and financial synergy slippage.
Product Swap Language
As we discussed, Salesforce likes to change up their product line to create disruption in the marketplace and in your contract. Introducing product swap language that enables you to swap products and services freely as long as you maintain the same annual contract value provides a huge value that is similar to that of a SELA.
FAQ’s
What happens if I exceed the caps on a product in my SELA Agreement?
Salesforce will use this overage as leverage against you in your upcoming negotiation. They will either charge you an overage fee or push a net new product on you in exchange for waving your overage fee. This net new product helps them achieve additional revenue, new products, and a larger footprint inside of your organization.
When you exceed the caps on a product in your SELA Agreement you are naturally placing yourself in a vulnerable position with Salesforce.
Many organizations who have an active SELA Agreement with Salesforce don’t have an internal software asset management (SAM) team. As such, these organizations won’t know they have exceeded their cap limit until Salesforce informs them. Even with an active SAM team inside multinational organizations it can be very easy to exceed your caps.
In general, 6 months prior to your contract renewal, Salesforce will conduct an audit on your account to look for any overages. If your organization is not already aware of these overages you’re naturally going to be on your heels trying to fact check information internally. Either way, Salesforce will use these overages as leverage against you in the upcoming renewal negotiation.
There are two scenarios that commonly play out within this situation:
First, if you notice you have exceeded the cap limit, you can take corrective action to decrease your quantities of specific products so that you are back in compliance. Your organization will technically be obligated to pay overage fees for the time those overages were occurring within your environment. The standard language within Salesforce agreements indicates you will be liable to pay the “published retail rate.” In other words, the rate that Salesforce publicly publishes on their website without your organization’s discount.
Second, if Salesforce notices that you have exceeded the cap limit, then you will be hit with a heavy overage fee in a similar manner as discussed above. However, Salesforce will likely use this opportunity to push new products within your environment in exchange for some of the overage fee. The net outcome, if not properly negotiated, will be a higher total cost of ownership over the term of your new contract than paying the overage fee by itself.
It’s important we state this again: Standard Salesforce MSA and SELA Agreements (aka all agreements) include a standard clause that any license overage will be charged at the then current retail price. That means instead of paying for additional seats at your discounted rate, they will charge you the retail price for the product that is currently listed on their website.
This is a very dangerous situation as the retail price can often be 2 -3x your standard rate.
We recommend negotiating specific contractual language that limits your financial liability to that of your organization’s reduced rate vs. retail.
How do you approach negotiating an existing SELA Agreement?
When renegotiating a SELA Agreement, we leverage our best-in-class and proprietary approach that we always use when Negotiating with Salesforce.
Mastering Your Salesforce Spend: Why Ditching the SELA Can Save You Millions
Create a Salesforce Roadmap
The first step in controlling your Salesforce spend is to build a roadmap of specific products and services you will need from Salesforce over the next 5 years. Create a list of both your needs and your wants.
With a Salesforce Enterprise License Agreement (SELA), it is very important that you build a 5-year game plan instead of a 1-3 year plan. The reason is that the 5-year roadmap will help you decide if a SELA agreement is right for you. If you are forecasting rapid growth or large M&A activity, then a SELA may make sense, assuming the proper legal terms and conditions are in place. But without either of those two components, a SELA rarely provides the differentiated and intrinsic value one would expect from its large price tag.
In most situations, a SELA Agreement will not make sense for most organizations. Putting together a Salesforce Roadmap will help you see this clearly. When you have a clear roadmap of what products you need, in what quantities, then you can use that as a benchmark on price.
Benchmark Your SELA Spend with Right Price Data
Once you have your roadmap, the next step is to gather Right Price Data for what rates you should be paying for each product on your roadmap.
At The Negotiator Guru, we have the largest database of Salesforce rates as a result of reviewing hundreds of Salesforce contracts for organizations that span literally every industry. We can tell you what you should be paying for each product or service.
While firms out there like Gartner can provide directionally correct information, they are not able to provide prescriptive insights for your specific situation. To access our Right Price Data for your account, contact us at info@thenegotiator.guru.
When you take this Right Price Data and line it up against your roadmap, you can see an estimation of what your Salesforce spend should be in a total cost of ownership view. Now simply take that total number and compare it to the annual spend of your SELA Agreement to see just how much of a savings potential is available for your organization.
Based on our real client data, we find there is typically a 41.3% opportunity available when switching from a SELA to a standard MSA & Order Form contract and pricing structure.
Examples of SELA Negotiation Success
Through our work at The Negotiator Guru, we have helped hundreds of organizations reduce their Salesforce expenses. Our firm is the industry-leading expert in negotiating with Salesforce.
Here are two recent examples of SELA negotiations we have completed with, and for, our clients. All company information has been redacted for client confidentiality.
Negotiating a $75M SELA Agreement down to $32M (57% savings)
One of our clients came to us with a 3-year term on a SELA Agreement valued at $25M per year. This was a total contract value of $75M over a 3-year period.
We worked with the client to create a Salesforce Roadmap and shift the organization over to an MSA & Order form contract and pricing structure. This simple shift produced a material reduction of their annual spend down to $10.7M per year for a 3-year term.
That is over 57% in savings and $43M in cost savings over a 3-year period. This example shows just how much SELA Agreements can be overpriced.
$30.5M in savings by negotiating a SELA Agreement that no longer made sense post-M&A
This particular organization was on a 5-year SELA Agreement. The SELA was designed based on the company footprint at the execution of the SELA Agreement.
There was one major problem—this specific organization was in the telecommunication industry which was experiencing heavy disruption. As a result of this disruption, the company divested several business units for financial and regulatory reasons. When these business units were divested, everyone assumed that their Salesforce contract would adjust accordingly… but that was not the case.
The response that came back from Salesforce was essentially, “It won’t be possible to reduce your spend because you have committed to this agreement for a total of 5 years.”
This meant that the telecom organization was now paying for products and services that were used by companies they divested, and they were committed to continuing to pay for those products for an additional 3.5 years. In total, this would be $36M in wasted expense over a 3.5-year period.
Through negotiations with Salesforce, we were able to reduce that down to a $5.5M breakup fee for a total savings of $30.5M over a 3-year period. This example shows just how important it is to structure in proper M&A language into your SELA and all Salesforce Agreements.
SELA Agreement Logistics and Strategy
What is the typical SELA annual spend?
The typical customer on a SELA agreement is a multinational organization doing over $10B in annual revenue with a total spend of $15M+ per year with Salesforce.
How long does the process take to renegotiate a SELA Agreement?
The process to renegotiate a SELA Agreement typically takes 2.5 months. That being said, to properly prepare for the negotiation, we engage our clients a minimum of 6 months prior to your natural renewal date. Remember, 80% of negotiation is done through thoughtful and intentional planning. In a best-case scenario, you want to plan for your SELA renewal 1 year in advance.
Who is involved in a SELA Agreement negotiation?
On your organization’s side, the following individuals should be involved in your core negotiation team:
- Head of IT Sourcing
- IT Leadership in charge of the Salesforce Platform
- IT Finance Representative
- CIO (Optional)
From The Negotiator Guru, the following individuals are involved:
- Lead Negotiator
- IT Architect
- Legal Representative
Do I need to switch off a SELA or just negotiate a lower price?
In most cases, it will make sense for you to switch from a SELA Agreement to a standard MSA & Order form agreement with Salesforce. While you do not have to switch, it is often the most advantageous for you as a customer of Salesforce.
There are several material reasons for this, however, the most prominent being that it’s very difficult to proactively measure the value you’re receiving from Salesforce when everything is bundled into an annual fee. This lack of transparency is by design from Salesforce, allowing your account team to do some creative accounting.
When you convert to an MSA & Order Form contract structure, you can compare your specific needs with Salesforce directly with our Right Price Data to understand exactly what you should be paying.
My company’s workflow is seasonal, and a SELA allows us to adjust licenses as needed. How do we accomplish this with a Salesforce Subscription Agreement?
You can achieve the same flexibility of a SELA by adding in Seasonal Worker Licenses within your subscription agreement. These licenses largely produce the same flexibility as they are intended to be used for seasonal contingent workers that increase and decrease throughout the year. Another common use for these licenses would be for college interns or factory workers.
In some cases, Salesforce will tell their customers that this product option does not exist. This is simply not the truth.
Recently, one of our customers did not believe that a “seasonal worker license” actually existed. Through multiple conversations with Salesforce, he was told this simply was not an option. We pulled up a screenshot of another client’s invoice, redacted all of the confidential information, and shared the invoice with “Seasonal Worker License” as a line item. The client was blown away. You can achieve a Seasonal Worker License... you just have to ask... perhaps more than once.
More resources
From Fortune 500 giants to fast-growing innovators, TNG has helped clients save 20% – 40%+ on enterprise software contracts — even when they thought it was impossible

Negotiating with Salesforce - Seven things you need to know about how Salesforce looks at a deal
Salesforce is good at negotiating. So your chances of getting a good deal are enhanced by understanding how they look at a deal and their goals. Your Salesforce Account Executive will lead the team you are negotiating with, in close coordination with his or her manager. This team is your path to getting the best overall deal. And while they are trained to maximize Salesforce revenue, they won’t get paid unless you make a purchase. So if you ask the right questions, and provide information that can help them get to a discount level you are comfortable with, this is the win-win situation all are striving for.
The remainder of this article provides some guidelines and background that will help you to get there.
1. Salesforce sales teams earn commissions on incremental revenue
Account Executives (also called “reps”) and their management are paid based on incremental revenue, not total revenue. If you don't buy additional licenses (or spend additional money), they don't earn commissions. More specifically, if your total spend this year is not more than last year’s, they don’t earn commissions this year. They are indifferent to whether you purchase licenses for more users, add-ons licenses for existing users, or you swap out one type of license for another, as long as the total spend is more. This is actually a good thing for the customer because it gives you more leverage and allows you to adjust your purchasing to your needs.
2. Salesforce AE’s are paid when the deal is signed
SF reps and management are paid in advance for the 12-month value of whatever you are deploying now. While they will ask for a longer contract such as three or five years, they are open to a shorter term, since most, if not all of their commissions are based on first-year revenue only. This varies from year to year, but the first year is always more important.
3. Timing matters
Salesforce's fiscal year ends in January. While this may seem strange, it is actually quite intentional. They can work with a customer the entire year to justify a new purchase, and wait until that customer's new fiscal year starts in January when the budget becomes available. And since the sales team gets paid on an annual quota they are quite happy with January deals. This often leads to very large February commission checks!
But it's not only the end of the year that matters, as management and reps are often encouraged through bonus payments to close deals at the end of a quarter.
Customers can take advantage of this quarter and year-end effect by asking for and often getting discounts that would otherwise not be available.
4. Discount authority is distributed
There are many articles in the public realm indicating that the rep has no power, and all of the decision-making lies with a special team that has the authority. This is not quite correct. Your rep has access to a discount/approval matrix indicating what level of discount is available, by license and quantity, and what organizational level is needed to approve it. They know how much of a discount they can get approval for, and whom they need to get that approval from.
In general, each level of management has a specific level of discount they can approve. So for example, for a given size deal, your rep may be able to offer you a 10% discount without additional approval. His manager may be able to approve an additional 5%, and each level of management above can offer some additional discounting. The special approvals team is involved only when a deal requires additional discounting, beyond what a given size of deal and management level can approve. A good rep knows how to work this structure, and will do so to get you the best deal they believe they need to have to get your signature.
So while the rep doesn't necessarily have the authority to grant you the discount you might want, they are your advocate and absolutely control the path to get you a better deal. So keep pushing and asking for more - as you get closer to year-end or quarter-end, more of the management will be interested in helping your rep get you a bigger discount. And it is highly likely that your rep’s manager (Salesforce calls the first-line sales manager a “Regional Vice President”, or “RVP”) is fully knowledgeable about every deal, so going above the rep does not necessarily get you better discounts.
5. Discounts depend on both deal size and customer size
Larger deals and larger customers generally get larger discounts. The combination of order size and customer spend leads to the discount they might offer you for a particular purchase. For example, a $100k purchase from a customer spending $2M annually will likely get a larger discount than that same $100k purchase from a customer spending $500k annually.
Conversely, a $2M customer making a $10k purchase may get a larger discount than a $100K purchase made by a new customer.
While deal size determines the discount level, customer size determines where the discount level for the deal starts.
6. Consolidating purchases increase your discount
Salesforce loves it when you make lots of little purchases. Each one is considered as if it were the only purchase you are making, and thus separate individual purchases lead to higher overall spend (see #5). When you are about to make a purchase, be sure to consider if any other groups in your organization are doing the same, as well as purchases you might be making in the short term future. If you can consolidate the orders into a single request, your deal size goes up, and your discount level will likely improve.
7. Consider near term future demand in your current purchase
As an extension to the previous point to consolidate your purchases, this can be extended to include purchases that will likely be made in the next few months or even the next year. Providing this to the account team will allow them to provide several options to you, and you will be able to see larger discount levels that might be available to you. This will likely include making the full year’s purchase upfront, which will lower your cost per license, but potentially increase your short-term spend.
The downside of advancing purchases before you need them is that there will be licenses that are unused for part of the contract term. You can then compare which is better for you, both in the short term and the long term, since your renewals will start from a lower price per user. You may find that even though some licenses are unused for a time, your overall cost is lower, especially when you consider the cost of several years in the future. Most good account teams will be able to provide you sufficiently better deals to make this worthwhile for you to make the purchase up front. And since you have already paid for the licenses, the faster you can deploy them, the more you will benefit, without incurring additional costs.
Bonus - Not all licenses need to be activated concurrently
Let's say you are planning on deploying 900 licenses in the next 12 months, with a schedule of 300 in month 1, 300 in month 4, and 300 in month 7.
You will almost always get a better price if you purchase all 900 at once, rather than 3 purchases of 300, but you will end up with licenses that you are paying for and not using for some of this time. Conversely, if you make three purchases, you are not paying for anything prior to actually deploying them, but the cost per license will be higher.
A better option is often available that combines the best of both. You can agree to purchase the 900 licenses in a single order but delay the activation dates for the licenses you will not be activating in the next few months. Your order form will have three line items, one for each activation date. But since your discount will be based on the full 900 license purchase, they will all be less expensive, and you are not paying prior to when you need them! Salesforce calls this a “staggered deal” structure.
Ready to explore joining the TNG family? Contact us today to set-up a client intake assessment where we identify your cost savings opportunity for free!
.jpg)
Guide to Salesforce Pricing: How Much should Salesforce Cost in 2021?
Yes, you can negotiate your contract with Salesforce.
Much like other large IT and SaaS vendors, Salesforce expects you to negotiate. Most customers do not know they can negotiate IT contracts or are hesitant to do so out of fear of compromising the business relationship. Some customers do attempt to negotiate but are largely unsuccessful because they do not know how to navigate the complicated process.
It is possible to achieve a margin of reduction anywhere from 15% to 50% in your Salesforce contracts. In our experience, the most successful negotiations focus on mutual value rather than a lower price.
Salesforce, by design, has developed its sales organization so that the customer-facing account representatives do not fully understand where rates should be per client. These individuals are the clients’ day-to-day contacts and have some local knowledge from their book of business, but they do not always have the full picture.
The sales system runs through a “business desk” or “deal desk.” The business desk is Salesforce’s decision-maker, with the account representative serving as something of a middle-man on your behalf. Read more about the business desk system.
How does Salesforce determine pricing?
First, it is important to clear up misconceptions about seasonal pricing. Many of our clients have been conditioned to believe that you must negotiate with software vendors at the end of the vendor’s fiscal year. They are operating under the assumption that the vendor is hustling to meet its annual or quarterly sales goals and is highly motivated to offer deals. This is an expensive and erroneous assumption. Salesforce, for example, has monthly targets as well; they change depending on how well certain sales verticals are performing and which products are selling.
In general, Salesforce pricing is consistent with most SaaS organizations in that the more volume you have, the lower your price will be. However, there is no standard pricing for Salesforce. There is no “best in class” rate across industries; if another company is paying less than you, that means nothing at face value. In fact, sales teams at Salesforce are trained to rebut those concerns.
In addition to the number of users, Salesforce pricing varies wildly based on three primary variables: industry, annual contract value (the amount of money you pay to Salesforce each year), and the customer’s (your) annual revenue.
Other factors that can lead to additional fees is the number of custom objects, permissions, profiles, developer support, integrations with Outlook or Gmail, dashboard creation, customizable reports, custom objects, external apps, lead scoring, and other additional features.
Consider this example: Two companies, one in manufacturing and one in life sciences, have roughly the same annual revenue and roughly the same annual contract value. The main differentiator is the industry; this could mean price points vary as much as 30% to 40%. Why? Salesforce operates using a type of value-based pricing model, where prices are set based on a customer’s perceived value of the solution. Industries like manufacturing and consumer goods with relatively small profit margins tend to see lower Salesforce costs. It is unlikely an individual sales rep would see this, being siloed into his or her own industry vertical.
What are Salesforce’s prices?
For the most part, Salesforce products are priced on a per user/per month or per digital capability /per month basis, billed annually. Customers who need additional Sandboxes, Shield, Platform Encryption, etc. will also experience variable pricing which is calculated on a percentage basis against a set of core SF products (like Sales/Service Cloud licenses). Salesforce calls this “derived pricing” and, contrary to what your account team will tell you, it’s highly negotiable as it delivers a high commission incentive. Publicly, Salesforce will tell you these products are 30% of net contract value. The “should cost” percentage of these derived products are reliant on the 3 variables described above with a specific emphasis on your product mix and annual contract value with Salesforce.
Below you will find the “list pricing” for Salesforce. On average, through proper negotiation you can save 15-75% off of these list prices.
Salesforce CRM Pricing (See also: add-ons)
Work.com
- Workplace Command Center: $5/user/month. Manage the complex process of opening your business and getting employees back to work safely in the COVID-19 environment
- Emergency Response Management for Public Sector: $300/user/month. Prioritize and mobilize emergency resources
- Emergency Response Management for Public Health: $450/user/month. Protect communities and provide personalized patient care at scale
- Contact Tracing: $200/user/month. Protect your employees and customers from the risk of infection
Small Business Solutions
- Essentials: $25/user/month. All-in-one sales and support app
- Sales/Service Professional: $75/user/month. Complete sales/service solution for any size team
- Pardot Growth: $1,250/org/month. Suite of marketing automation tools for any size team
Salesforce Sales Cloud Pricing
- Salesforce Essentials: $25/user/month billed annually. All-in-one sales and support app
- Lightning Professional Edition: $75/user/month. Complete CRM for any team size
- Lightning Enterprise: $150/user/month. Deeply customizable sales CRM
- Lightning Unlimited: $300/user/month. Unlimited CRM power and support
Salesforce Service Cloud Pricing
- Essentials Edition: $25/user/month billed annually. All-in-one sales and support app
- Professional: $75/user/month. Complete service CRM for any team size
- Enterprise: $150/user/month. Customizable CRM for comprehensive service
- Unlimited: $300/user/month. Unlimited CRM power
Marketing Cloud
- Customer 360 Audiences
- Corporate: $12,500/org/month. Give mid-sized businesses tools to unify and grow data assets
- Enterprise: $50,000/org/month. Help large-scale organizations unify, segment, and activate all data
- Enterprise Plus: $65,000/org/month. Enterprise edition plus Premier Support
- Loyalty Management
- B2B: $30,000/org/month. Incentivize channel partners and distributors with a B2B loyalty program
- B2C: $35,000/org/month. Launch and manage more dynamic and personalized B2C loyalty experiences
- B2C Loyalty Plus: $45,000/org/month. Run multiple loyalty programs on a single platform
- Pardot (up to 10,000 contacts)
- Growth: $1,250/org/month. Fuel growth with marketing automation
- Plus: $2,500/org/month. Dive deeper with marketing automation and analytics
- Advanced: $4,000/org/month. Power innovation with advanced marketing automation and analytics
- Premium: $15,000/org/month. Enterprise-ready features with predictive analytics and support
Email, Mobile, Web Marketing
- Basic: $400+/org/month. Personalized promotional email marketing
- Pro: $1,250+/org/month. Personalized marketing automation with email solutions
- Corporate: $3,750+/org/month. Personalized cross-channel strategic marketing solutions
- Enterprise: Ask for a quote. Sophisticated journeys across channels, brands, and geographies
Social Studio
- Basic: $1,000/org/month. Start your social media marketing journey with listening and engagement
- Pro: $4,000/org/month. Listen, publish, and engage across social networks
- Corporate: $12,000/org/month. Social marketing and social customer service for companies with multiple brands or products
- Enterprise: $40,000/org/month. Maximize results at scale across teams, brands, and geographies
Advertising Studio
- Professional: $2,000+/mo. Power audiences across digital advertising with CRM
Datorama
- Starter: $3,000+/org/month. Begin your marketing intelligence journey and unify, visualize, and activate your marketing data
- Growth: $10,000+/org/month. Grow your marketing intelligence platform across all campaigns, channels, and platforms
- Plus: Ask for a quote. Complete marketing intelligence across regions, brands, and business units
Google Marketing Platform
- Google Analytics 360: $12,500+/org/month. Turn insights into action with Google Analytics 360
- Google Analytics 360 + Optimize 360: $17,500+/month. Test, adapt, and personalize with Optimize 360
Salesforce CMS: $10,000/org/month. Build connected content and digital experiences at scale
Commerce Cloud
- B2B Commerce: Quote request
- B2C Commerce: Quote request
Platform
- Starter: $25/user/month. Build custom apps that fuel sales, service, and marketing productivity
- Platform Plus: $100/user/month. Extend Salesforce to every employee, every department, and transform app dev for your entire organization
How much does a Salesforce implementation cost?
A Salesforce implementation will cost on average 10-30% of your annual spend with Salesforce for a standard implementation. The primary factors that will cause the cost of your Salesforce implementation fees to vary is the amount of custom integrations, configuration services, and custom objects required by your organization.
To learn more read our article about How much does a Salesforce implementation cost?
How do we get a Salesforce discount?
Discounts through organizational growth:
Organizational growth is the greatest leverage a company can have when negotiating discounts. Whether a company grows organically by adding more employees or capabilities, or inorganically through mergers or acquisitions, the need for more user licenses is an excellent starting point for negotiations. When company growth leads to both new users and new products, the opportunity for more extensive discounts increases.
Discounts through product expansion:
Companies that do not have planned organic or inorganic growth can build leverage by opting for some new or trending products.
If you are just purchasing a basic CRM platform for lead, contact, & opportunity management, then you will likely struggle to receive a large discount. Although Salesforce routinely offers discounts on cross-industry platforms such as Einstein for analytics. It is discounted because it has not been widely adopted and few implementations have been successful. When Salesforce is actively pushing Einstein or another specific product, there are massive sales incentives and greater discounts. These discounts can be leveraged to negotiate further discounts in core licenses.
While Einstein is promoted across industries regularly, other industry-specific platforms may be incentivized at different times of the year. Without inside knowledge, it is impossible to predict or know what products will be incentivized at what time. Because we work with Salesforce constantly, The Negotiator Guru has a much clearer picture of the Salesforce landscape. Our active client engagements and professional relationships with former Salesforce employees allow us to work on your behalf to move through the negotiation process.
How do we manage Salesforce cost over time?
Once you have successfully worked with TNG to negotiate your first contract, what happens when renewal time comes around? Clear, established ownership of Salesforce within an organization plays a critical role in managing costs moving forward.
Salesforce’s ideal customer is one with multiple business units where needs and goals are not aligned across functions. No one is leveraging spend or standardizing rates/terms. Salesforce sales reps plan for an annual 10% increase in revenue from every customer, so customers should expect to be presented with the latest and greatest tool or app when sales conversations begin. When each business unit works independently with Salesforce, it is far more likely a company will pay for more software than it needs.
TNG recommends a centralized authority that manages the overall relationship with Salesforce but particularly the tactical management of licenses. An internal Center of Excellence that can manage the entire Salesforce instance from an enterprise perspective, move licenses around as necessary, ensure products are being used appropriately, and continue refining and adjusting the Salesforce roadmap along the way.
Conclusion
Our negotiation process is driven by a simple concept: right size, right price. Similar clients should pay the same price for the same product, know what rates they should be paying in comparison to their peers, and know what to look for in software contracts to eliminate potential issues before they arise. Salesforce has hidden much of this process in the shadows, making it challenging for companies to make informed investments in technologies.

Understanding how Salesforce Negotiates in 2026
The key to properly negotiating with Salesforce is understanding how the organization works. Salesforce has a brilliantly designed sales system that is set up to maximize revenue from every account.
Many of the tactics used in its sales process and organization design are borrowed from other big players such as Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, etc. Our goal with this article is to give you a strong understanding of the Salesforce machine so that you can prepare accordingly.
Understanding how your sales rep fits into the machine
Maybe you like your rep, maybe you don’t. We see clients all across the spectrum in terms of the relationship they have with their rep. Regardless of what your relationship is, it’s important that you understand how your rep fits into the actual Salesforce machine.
The first thing you must understand is that your rep is at the bottom of the totem pole in Salesforce. They are the “in-the-weeds Salesperson” who is put out to handle tactical sales and execution.
By design, your rep is given limited information. They actually are never fully educated on what the rates should be or what discounts they can even provide.
Let me repeat that: Your rep does not even know what rates other companies of your size are getting other than those within their own portfolio.
Salesforce limits the amount of discretionary information it shares with its sales organization intentionally. The company does this many reasons, one of which is so that your rep can sell to you in a genuine and authentic way. If your rep knew that other companies were paying 30% less than you, they might feel guilty for charging you 30% more and/or fight harder for you to get a lower rate in the interest of closing the deal.
Think about this; if your rep doesn’t know that you are paying 30% above the most competitive rates, and instead actually believes you are getting a great deal, then they are going to explain this to you in an authentic way. They may tell you something like: “This is the best rate I have ever given a customer of your size.” This may very well be the truth, but that doesn’t mean it's the best rate that Salesforce can provide for a company of your size, etc.
Instead of thinking about your rep as the opponent in this negotiation, it’s important to understand how they fit into the organization.
Our goal in our 4-step negotiation process is to coach your rep in a way that organically sends the most effective messages up the totem pole (aka the "business desk") at Salesforce to ensure you get the best deal.
Understanding the “business desk"
In order to drive the largest positive impact in any negotiation with Salesforce, we need to work with the “business desk." The “business desk” is a somewhat secretive sales management team inside of the company that is intended to purely support your sales rep. Remember, sales reps are given very little decision-making authority. All official decisions that have any material impact on a client's rates are developed and approved by the business desk.
The concept of a business desk is not new nor unique in highly complex/profitable sales organizations. It was originally developed by companies like McKinsey and originally tested, validated, and further refined in firms like Microsoft. At its most basic and original function it was intended to as act as a quality/price control organization before the concept of Software as a Service (SaaS) was even conceptualized. Fast forward many years and it has developed into an elusive organization that ultimately acts as the "bad guy." In other words, it holds the rights to any decision making but will never officially interface directly with the customer leaving your sales rep to pass messages back and forth.
As a result, your goal in a negotiation is to train your sales rep on how to best communicate and send messages to his business desk that are going to help you achieve more out of the negotiation. Yes, you heard that right. Your job in this negotiation will be to indirectly train your sales rep on how to work with their own organization to get you the best possible deal. That is, of course, assuming they actually want you to get a good deal…
Our goal is to empower you to send the right messages, at the right time, to the business desk in order to meet and/or exceed your desired objectives.
Your sales rep’s emotions
Sometimes your rep may get somewhat heated during the negotiation and say something like “I am doing everything I can to get this deal through for you but I just can’t go any lower.”
When your rep says something like this to you it’s important you keep a facts based demeanor and keep any emotional response in check. The company’s goal here is to humanize the sales organization and make you feel empathetic during the negotiation. Their emotional response will naturally distract you from the actual facts of the deal.
Please remember your rep may actually be a very honest person. Subsequently, their emotional response to any negativity within the negotiation is designed as part of the sales system. In other words, when your rep gets emotional about fighting for your discounts, that is Salesforce winning…a clear indication of the sales system producing the exact desired result.
This is why we call it the Salesforce machine. The dynamic between the client, sales rep, and business desk is brilliantly designed. The key here is to understand and identify these dynamics.
Divide and Conquer Tactics
Whenever we describe this tactic to our customers, we almost always hear; “Yep, that is exactly what they did.”
Divide and conquer is a brilliant, yet traditional, sales tactic that Salesforce has perfected over the years. The larger the client organization the more important and effective these tactics become for Salesforce.
The concept is simple: Build as many stakeholder relationships as possible at various levels inside the client organization with the overall objective of obtaining as much information as possible. Use this information to extract conflicting stories of the organization’s wants and needs so that the client may potentially buy more than they need.
If you are a smaller account under $300k per year, you may not see this happen. But as your annual spend reaches $500k or $1M+, these tactics will most certainly be used as a way to grow your account.
Understanding Divide and Conquer Tactics
Let’s explore a simple example of how this routinely plays out in a client organization…
Imagine you are in IT Procurement and hold the responsibility of negotiating your company’s Salesforce contract renewal.
As your renewal starts to get closer, you may suddenly experience that Salesforce has, without your direct knowledge;
- Invited your C-Suite to a basketball game with courtside tickets;
- Reached out to IT Department heads to discuss their 1-3 year growth objectives;
- Initiated a direct connection with your VP of Sales;
- Identify and reach out to your top Sales Representatives to explore how they could further use the tool;
- Invite your colleagues to a “wine and dine” evening for relationship building purposes, etc.
Best of all is that those taking the above actions may not actually be your direct sales rep but rather their superiors who have the sole purpose of gathering as much intelligence about your organization as possible.
With this momentum, Salesforce will commonly know more about the needs and wants of its client organization more than their client contact (aka you!). They will use this information to their advantage and create organized chaos and confusion in your organization.
Further expanding upon our original example, let’s explore the output of these tactics:
CEO - Your CEO is taken out to a basketball game where the higher ups at Salesforce paint a picture of what your organization could look like with added functionality and full adoption of Salesforce. They gain his buy-in and suddenly your organization has pressure coming down from the top to roll out Salesforce to the entire organization.
CFO - With this new pressure coming down, your CFO is left scrambling to figure out how to create budget for these additional Salesforce expenses which were not in the original budget. Your CFO talks directly with Salesforce and they start getting creative on cash flow. They offer to move your renewal to January, instead of September, to utilize multiple fiscal year budgets.
CIO - Your CIO is furious because the CFO is now going to pull funds from his operational budget. Your CIO had planned to use these funds for other business critical initiatives that need to be completed this year. Subsequently, he’s also upset that Salesforce is talking with his colleagues and keeping him in the dark. This creates and emotional response and your CIO reaches out directly to Salesforce. Salesforce then begins meeting with your CIO directly and discusses their overall IT roadmap.
VP of Sales - When your VP of Sales speaks to Salesforce, he shares his ideal vision and requests more functionality and training for his team to increase adoption.
Sales Reps – When a few of your top performing Sales Reps are contacted by Salesforce, they further explain how it would be great if they received deeper support, had additional customizations, and more functionality.
Salesforce Admin - Your Salesforce Admin is the primary business stakeholder providing requirements to IT Procurement and also responsible for the outcome of the negotiation. They now have conflicting messages coming from every stakeholder in the organization…
- The CEO wants to implement the full vision;
- The CFO doesn’t have the budget;
- The CIO is pissed off because his IT budget is getting pulled and Salesforce still doesn’t integrate properly with their ERP;
- Your VP of Sales wants more functionality and training;
- Your Sales reps wants more customization and new functionality.
What does your Salesforce Admin do in this situation? They ask Salesforce: What do you think I should do?
As a result, Salesforce is now running the negotiation. They are telling you what to buy and when to buy it. At this point, you have lost control of the negotiation and Salesforce has essentially “won the game.”
If you let Salesforce divide and conquer without the proper planning and communication strategies, you will lose significant value creation opportunity.
An Aligned Organization is a Rarity
The situation we just described to you is extremely common in both large and small organizations. Most organizations suffer from what many of us know as “initiative overload” and simply do not commit the time or resources to align on forward looking business (not just IT) plans for leveraging strategic platforms such as Salesforce.
Salesforce knows this and leverages this lack of alignment to create growth opportunities.
It is exceptionally rare to find an organization that is: 1) actually aligned; 2) has a plan for how they will use Salesforce over the next three to five years (aligned to its business objectives).
As part of negotiation preparation, we drive clients to curate this planning and alignment so that you know what you need before even starting the negotiation.
Our proprietary tool for doing this is something we call the Salesforce Roadmap (catchy right!? ?). At a high level, this is simply a detailed list of “what you need” and “when you need it.” Again, you need to be clear on the “what” and the “when.”
If you don’t create your own Salesforce Roadmap, then Saleforce’s Divide and Conquer techniques previously discussed will likely create an over-inflated roadmap for you. Subsequently, if Salesforce creates the roadmap for you, then you are left on your heels saying “Wait a second….is this what we actually need or is this just what they are telling us that we need?”
The Salesforce Fiscal Year
Another very important thing to understand about Salesforce is that their Fiscal year ends on January 31st. Now at first you may say, “That’s kind of odd…why would anyone make their fiscal year end January 31st?”
Once again, this is done by brilliant design.
Salesforce is an expert at working with Corporate America. It knows that most companies operate on a standard calendar fiscal year (January-December). Subsequently, most budgets are solidified sometime between October – January which opens up a new (potentially larger) budget.
By moving your renewal to January, Salesforce is now able to…
- Influence your fiscal year budgeting conversations through proposals;
- Be flexible with payment terms enabling the ability for clients to use two fiscal budgets for a single subscription year; and,
- Have increased control over its own fiscal year budgeting, forward looking market statements, and investor relations.
Think about this…by placing their fiscal year end at January 31st, Salesforce now has a great excuse to say “Let’s renew early because we will be able to provide the greatest discount right before our fiscal year ends.”
In most cases, Salesforce will naturally incentivize you to renew early with a January effective date. While this may seem like a no-brainer, we regularly advise all our clients to take advantage of this offer only when you forecast significant growth/decline in your account.
The Difference Between a New and an Existing Salesforce Customer
It’s very important to understand that Salesforce treats new and existing customers very differently. Unsurprisingly, sales performance incentives are very different for both segments.
New Customers
When you are negotiating your first purchase with Salesforce your rep is incentivized to sell you as much as possible. While this may seem like common sense it’s important to know that this particular incentive is extremely high. Since selling a new customer is always harder than a renewal, Salesforce designs its compensation structure so that reps see a significantly higher sales commission from new customer accounts.
- Watch out: Initial Footprint - Naturally, the larger initial footprint a software supplier has in your organization the harder it is for you (the client) to leave. No matter whether you hire an external advisor or conduct the negotiation by yourself please be cognizant of the fact there is a natural tendency to overbuy in the 1st year in the interest of capturing the “greatest discount.”
- Note: Based on customer demand, we will be writing a separate article specifically focusing on New Agreement Customers titled “Top 5 Tips When Negotiating a New Salesforce Agreement.”
Existing Customers
The Salesforce machine has been developed in a way that promotes and incentivizes year-over-year growth in your account. This may be common sense to some, however, what you may not expect or realize is that prior to any renewal discussions from even occurring, Salesforce has already booked (planned for) a 10% increase in your account.
- What this Means - While you may be going into the negotiation wanting to keep the same rates or even reduce them, Salesforce has established a negotiation baseline that is 10% above your current budget. As we will discuss further in future articles, this increase may come in many different forms…some obvious and others not.
- Note: Based on customer demand, we will be writing a separate article specifically focusing on New Agreement Customers titled “Top 5 Tips When Negotiating a Salesforce Renewal Agreement.”
This is how Salesforce operates and is a standard expectation across all of its business lines. In other words, if Salesforce were to maintain the status quo on current rates and license counts (aka 0% increase), then your sales rep’s performance metrics would be negatively impacted.
Subsequently, one of the worst scenarios for Salesforce is if your contract is reduced in anyway at renewal…even by one dollar. (Yes, we actually have a funny client story about this…)
Even if you’re dropping a service like Pardot or Premier Support, Salesforce will automatically fight to get those funds reallocated to other licenses or add-ons (“lift and shift”). Salesforce incentivizes its sales reps to identify and execute these budget “lift and shift” opportunities at renewal time in underutilized accounts with nearly as much intensity as net new revenue.
Understanding Salesforce’s Products and Services
Forgive our play on words here but what you must understand about Salesforce’s different products and services is that they are hard to understand.
Many of our customers who have now been with Salesforce for 3, 5, 10+ years often complain “It seems like they keep changing the license tiers or product names. It’s just confusing and I don’t really understand why I am paying more for what seems like the same thing.”
Once again, this is by design and taken right out of the Microsoft playbook.
Think about it like this…Imagine your renewal comes up and you have been purchasing X product or service for the past 3 years. Your rep now conveniently informs you that “We have actually discontinued that specific product and it has now been rolled into product Y. You will maintain the capabilities of our legacy product X but with enhancements that will help you get more from the platform. As a result of these new enhancements your license cost has increased, the new price is Z.”
Sound familiar?
You were just thrown a curveball and suddenly are unable to compare apple-to-apples. Instead of focusing on the price of that new product, you are focused on what it is, and if this is a right fit. This is revenue generating distraction impacts both large and small customers.
Salesforce sales incentives vary by product and service
It’s important to understand that sales incentives vary across Salesforce’s different products and services. This is done for a variety of reasons but the most common example being new product/service introductions are typically incentivized with higher commissions. As a result, it is natural for sales reps to push new products to renewal customers.
In addition to new products, high commissions are paid for “land grab” product/service lines. When we say “land grab” we mean a product or service that breaks Salesforce into a new department inside of your organization. A few common examples are:
- Pardot is a land grab into your marketing department; and
- Service desk is a land grab into your customer service department.
Salesforce fights hard to make these land grabs for a few key reasons:
- It makes them stickier within your organization;
- It gives them more contacts which creates further opportunities for their divide and conquer approach; and,
- It gives them an entirely new department where they can land and expand organically.
Whenever you are considering offering up a “land grab” to Salesforce (expanding into different product lines, departments, etc.) please know you have a great negotiation opportunity. This leverage can be used to lower your overall total cost of ownership if navigated correctly.
The Bottom Line
The “Salesforce machine” is a brilliantly designed sales system. The first step to understanding how you can reduce your rates is to know what you are up against. A few key takeaways:
- Your reps do not know the true rates for comparable companies;
- The “Business Desk” is the only decision-making authority;
- The “Divide and Conquer” approach is the most commonly used, and most successful, sales tactic by Salesforce to drive sales growth;
- The Salesforce fiscal year ends January 31st. This enables the use of multiple fiscal year client budgets to fund growth;
- New and existing (renewal) customers are treated very differently and should use a completely different negotiation approach;
- Sales incentives vary by product and service. “Land Grab” products often carry a higher incentive as it expands their footprint in your organization.
Our goal with this article has been to educate you on the key points of how the Salesforce machine operates. Based on significant current and prospective customer requests, we will be writing additional articles that do a deep dive into the many facets of successfully negotiating with Salesforce.
Explore other TNG Resource Articles, Follow The Negotiator Guru on LinkedIn, Follow Dan Kelly on LinkedIn and learn more about What We Do.
© Kelly Consulting Group, LLC. dba "The Negotiator Guru", 2026. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.

