3 Strategies to Elevate Your Software Supplier Relationship

Over the years, our TNG client family has requested more and more guidance related to managing and elevating their commercial supplier relationships. Within this article, you’ll find our top 3 proven strategies to transform IT supplier relationships from tactical to strategic.

Strategy #1 – Control the Flow

When we say “control the flow”, we’re referring to conversation, meeting, and engagement flow.

When prospective clients reach out to TNG, they almost always have the complaint that the supplier knows more about the “needs” of their organization than they do. This most typically is due to the internal lack of time and/or resources to focus on a specific supplier or digital capability. On the other hand, the supplier’s sales team is laser focused on opportunities to grow their business inside of your organization. Immediately, this creates an unfair environment for all parties involved.

You may be thinking that this only creates an unfair advantage for you, the customer. Well, in most situations that’s true. However, it should also be noted that in some circumstances, the supplier’s sales team may be operating with good intentions and simply answering your internal stakeholder’s demand for attention. In short, when one side knows more than the other, it creates an uncomfortable situation for at least one party.

As our team brings 100+ years of collective experience, we have seen just about everything. Most of TNG’s clients are very well-established companies that have $5 billion+ in annual revenue. These companies typically have a “center of excellence (COE)” and/or a “software asset management (SAM)” team. While the overall intent is good, we typically see only about 10% of our clients leveraging these teams of resources correctly.

What happens to the other 90%? Well, one of the most classic inside sales techniques is for a supplier’s sales team member to establish, chair, and/or participate in a COE with a specific focus on their software and its many digital capabilities. This type of group typically meets either monthly or quarterly and is sold as a way in which the sales team member can “inform” the COE/SAM team members of the “demand” coming from inside of the organization. The reality is that the “demand” is often created by the sales team member who has been pushing a land-and-expand strategy inside of the organization.

The easiest way to not only level the playing field with your software suppliers, but also elevate the relationship from tactical to strategic, is to set up strict governance around the overall engagement. Every supplier engagement is slightly unique, but we recommend focusing on the following core tenants:

Focus your efforts on your Top 10 software suppliers.
Develop a steering team of executive IT leaders that are in control of the Digital Capability strategy for your company.
Develop an internal COE for each of your Top 10 suppliers. The size and scope of them should proportionally match the importance of the supplier’s impact on your business.
Identify and assign clear roles & responsibilities for each employee team member that is part of their performance objectives.
Do not allow supplier sales team members to be a member of the core team but rather serve as an invited guest on a routine cadence.

This is about the time where traditional sales team members will indicate that this approach will slow down process, innovation, growth, etc. The reality is quite the opposite when properly set up and managed. The primary outcomes you want to achieve are the following:

Shift the communication paradigm from outside-in to inside-out. This allows the company to ideate, contemplate, and organically socialize a software roadmap (vs. constantly asking the supplier for a list of their asset inventory).
Share information with suppliers only when it has been fully vetted and approved as a sanctioned project or approved proof of concept. If done properly, this drastically decreases the chance of duplicate purchasing, split requirements, and/or random unwarranted proof of concepts (that usually turn into shelfware) around the enterprise.
Allow everyone to be more efficient and structured with their time by eliminating the need for follow-up meetings, etc. In other words, engaging suppliers only after decisions have been made internally by the COE will enable the COE to be treated as a true authoritative entity vs a “check the box” exercise.
Provide opportunities for suppliers to suggest innovative solutions in a fully committed environment.

We find that our TNG clients save an average of 26% annually by deploying this strategy alone (with our help, of course).

Strategy #2 – Manage Upwards

Anyone who knows the basics of selling understands that the easiest way to make a sale is to identify and influence the decision-maker directly. For large enterprise sales teams who are managing multi-million-dollar contracts, that decision-maker is very often an executive leader within the company. Far too often, we find that organizations provide unfettered access to executives without reason. This, in short, usually enables a very unhealthy and complacent comfort for the supplier sales team that (if not properly managed) rarely produces intrinsic value for the company.

By far one of the most effective ways to elevate your supplier relationship is to set up strategic business discussions between company and supplier executives. The key here is to establish equal representation on both sides and ensure there is proper attention and respect established between both companies. Access to your company’s executives should largely be restricted to these meetings which, where possible, should be set up by the COE/SAM teams mentioned in Strategy #1.

Subsequently, it’s important to know that you can leverage access to your executives to exemplify to a new supplier that any new proof of concept, tool, etc. will be given the highest level of attention and visibility. This means a lot for any supplier (new or existing) as it ensures the right eyes are engaged.

Strategy #3 – Set Realistic Milestones that are Mutually Achievable

Just as employees like to understand their performance objectives for each year, it has been proven by TNG that suppliers who understand what “great looks like” outperform those that are not given clear business objectives. Nearly everyone in the business world understands the concept of milestones; however, the implementation of the methodology is highly inconsistent.

One of the many mistakes companies make when establishing a milestone-based contract is they make the actual milestones either ambiguous or unrealistic. Both are equally as dangerous. Ambiguity allows everyone to be right and wrong at the same time. Unrealistic milestones, if accepted by the supplier, often induce unhealthy behaviors by those chartered with meeting or exceeding the same. It doesn’t take much to set a once “strategic” relationship on a path to implosion with either of these scenarios.

Establishing realistic milestones is important for your suppliers. Everyone, at every age, enjoys accomplishing a goal. It’s important to recognize this fact since at the end of the day, as this is a human reaction, and well, we’re all human.

To learn how to properly set up a milestone plan and/or implement any other strategies mentioned above that drive performance for both the company and the supplier, here’s a hint: It’s not just the supplier that has performance milestones!

More resources

From Fortune 500 giants to fast-growing innovators, TNG has helped clients save 20% – 40%+ on enterprise software contracts — even when they thought it was impossible

Salesforce Renewal Negotiations: 7 Vendor Tactics That Will Cost You Millions (And How to Counter Them)

Let's cut to the chase: Salesforce didn't become a $30+ billion company by accident. They've built a renewal machine that's incredibly effective at extracting maximum value from enterprise customers: often at your expense.

If you're a CIO, CFO, or procurement leader heading into a Salesforce renewal negotiation, you need to understand exactly what you're walking into. Because here's the uncomfortable truth: your Salesforce rep isn't your partner. They're a highly trained professional whose compensation depends on growing your contract value.

We've helped hundreds of enterprises navigate Salesforce contract negotiations, and we've seen every play in their playbook. Here are the seven tactics that cost organizations millions: and exactly how to counter each one.

Tactic #1: The Timing Trap

Salesforce will reach out months before your renewal: not to help you plan, but to control the conversation before you've had time to assess your actual needs. They'll frame this as "getting ahead of things" or "ensuring a smooth renewal."

Meanwhile, they're identifying upsell opportunities, understanding your budget cycle, and positioning themselves to apply pressure when you're most vulnerable.

The Counter-Move: Start your internal renewal planning 6 months before your renewal date. Audit your current usage, assess alternatives, and build executive alignment before Salesforce initiates contact. When you control the timeline, you control the negotiation.

Minimalist illustration of Salesforce renewal negotiation timing with business leaders controlling negotiation deadlines.

Tactic #2: The Inflated Baseline

Here's a number Salesforce hopes you never discover: their initial renewal quote typically starts around 10% above your current spend: before any "negotiation" even begins.

Some of these increases are obvious (new list prices, added users) while others are buried in contract language and other means. The goal? Anchor the conversation at a higher number so that any "discount" they offer still results in you paying more than you should.

Furthermore, it's important to understand that your Salesforce AE has a 10%+ revenue uplift target at each renewal which creates an automatic conflict when you're trying to save money. If your account is a "flat" renewal from the previous contract year with no sign of new products/licenses/etc. then you'll be handed over to the renewal desk. This team is compensated differently with the ultimate objective of never allowing your account to decrease below your current spend. Naturally, this team is incentivized to ensure there is 5% revenue growth.

The Counter-Move: Conduct a thorough license audit before engaging. Many organizations discover they're paying for Premium editions when Standard would suffice, or carrying licenses for users who left the company years ago. Our Right Price Benchmarking™ service consistently reveals that enterprises overpay by 20-40% simply because they never questioned the baseline.

Tactic #3: The Automatic Uplift Clause

Buried in your Master Service Agreement are automatic renewal and price increase provisions. These clauses can escalate your costs by 3-7% annually: without any renegotiation, without any added value, and often without you even noticing until the invoice arrives.

The Counter-Move: Scrutinize your MSA for these provisions immediately. Calendar your renewal dates with 6-month advance alerts. When you do renegotiate, explicitly address these clauses and push for caps on annual increases or elimination of auto-renewal terms entirely.

Tactic #4: The True-Up Surprise

True-up clauses sound reasonable: you pay for what you actually use. In practice, they're a landmine waiting to explode your budget.

Without careful tracking, you might add users throughout the year thinking you're within your allocation: only to receive a six-figure true-up invoice at renewal. Salesforce counts on organizations losing track of their usage, and they're rarely wrong.

The Counter-Move: Implement quarterly internal audits to track actual usage against your contracted terms. Better yet, negotiate true-down rights into your contract: the ability to reduce licenses if your needs decrease, not just pay more when they increase.

Modern flat image showing surprise costs from Salesforce true-up clauses during contract renewal negotiations.

Tactic #5: The Bundle Trap

This is one of Salesforce's most effective plays. Your rep will offer a "significant discount" on your renewal: but only if you bundle it with additional products, users, or support tiers you didn't ask for.

"I can get you 15% off, but only if we include Marketing Cloud in this deal."

Suddenly, your "discounted" renewal costs more than your original contract, and you're locked into products you may never fully deploy.

The Counter-Move: Flip the script. Bundle your own negotiation asks strategically. Combine price discussions with user alignment, unused license returns, true-down rights, and multi-year price caps. When you present a comprehensive counter-proposal, you gain leverage instead of surrendering it.

Tactic #6: The Support Plan Squeeze

After your initial contract term, Salesforce will push hard to maintain: or upgrade: your Premier or Premier+ support plan. They'll cite "business continuity" and "access to expertise" as justifications.

Here's what they won't tell you: most organizations' support needs drop dramatically after the first year. Your admins get trained. Your users figure things out. The urgent tickets become routine questions.

The Counter-Move: Reassess your support plan annually based on actual ticket volume and complexity. Many enterprises can safely downgrade from Premier to Standard support after their initial term, saving significant budget while reducing upsell pressure from the support team.

Business professional defends against Salesforce upsell and support plan pressure in contract negotiations.

Tactic #7: The Middleman Mirage

Your Salesforce account executive seems like your advocate. They're friendly, responsive, and always willing to "go to bat for you" on pricing.

Here's the reality: your AE has almost no authority to offer meaningful discounts. Real decisions happen at the SVP & EVP level in conjunction with Salesforce's Business Desk: a team you'll never meet directly. Your rep is an intermediary who controls the flow of information in both directions, and that information asymmetry benefits Salesforce, not you.

The Counter-Move: Develop clear, logical, outcomes-oriented messaging and ensure everyone your rep contacts delivers it consistently. Document everything in writing. When you hit a wall, escalate directly to the Business Desk through formal channels rather than relying on your rep to "see what they can do." This practice is an art and not a science...we have perfected the practice at TNG.

The Preparation Equation

Here's the framework that separates enterprises who get crushed in Salesforce renewal negotiations from those who walk away with favorable terms:

Spend 75% of your time on preparation. Only 25% on the actual negotiation.

That means:

Building a comprehensive Salesforce CRM Solution Blueprint (specific editions, feature sets, user counts, and measured value for each application)
Conducting honest internal assessments of what you actually need vs. what you're currently paying for
Researching competitive alternatives: not necessarily to switch, but to establish credible leverage
Aligning your executive team on priorities and walk-away points

Without this preparation, you're bringing a spreadsheet to a gunfight.

Why Impartiality Matters

At The Negotiator Guru (TNG), we don't sell Salesforce. We don't resell licenses. We don't take referral fees from vendors. Our only interest is getting you the best possible deal.

That impartiality is why our Right Price Benchmarking™ data is trusted by enterprises across industries. We know what companies like yours actually pay: not what Salesforce says companies pay.

When you walk into a negotiation armed with real benchmark data and proven counter-tactics, the dynamic shifts. Suddenly, you're not reacting to Salesforce's playbook. You're executing your own.

Ready to Take Control of Your Next Renewal?

Salesforce renewal negotiations don't have to be a losing battle. With the right preparation, the right data, and the right strategy, you can counter every tactic in their playbook and protect your organization from unnecessary spend.

If you're facing a Salesforce renewal in the next 6-12 months, now is the time to start preparing. Check out our Salesforce vendor spotlight for more insights, or explore our enterprise contract renewal solutions to see how we can help.

Because in Salesforce contract negotiation, the prepared win. Everyone else just pays the price.

Inc. Magazine Unveils Its First-Ever List of the Midwest’s Fastest-Growing Private Companies— The Inc. 5000 Series: Midwest

The Negotiator Guru Ranks No. 15 on the inaugural 2020 Inc. 5000 Series: Midwest

‍
NEW YORK, March 25, 2020 – Inc. magazine today revealed that The Negotiator Guru is No.15 on its inaugural Inc. 5000 Series: Midwest list, the most prestigious ranking of the fastest-growing private companies in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.

Born of the annual Inc. 5000 franchise, this regional list represents a unique look at the most successful companies within the Midwest economy’s most dynamic segment—its independent small businesses.

“We’re honored to be recognized in the Inc. 5000 list as one of the fastest growing private companies in the Midwest,” said Dan Kelly, Founder and Senior Partner. The Negotiator Guru also ranked #2 in the state of Minnesota and #5 in the category of Business Products and Services. “Our success is a direct result of the value we’ve delivered with, and for, our global enterprise client base. Congratulations to the TNG team!”

The companies on this list show stunning rates of growth across all industries in the 12 Midwest states. Between 2016 and 2018, these 250 private companies had an average growth rate of 360 percent and, in 2018 alone, they employed more than 27,000 people and added $13 billion to the Midwest’s economy. Companies based in the Chicago, Detroit, and Cincinnati areas brought in the highest revenue overall. Complete results of the Inc. 5000 Series: Midwest, including company profiles and an interactive database that can be sorted by industry, metro area, and other criteria, can be found here starting March 25, 2020.

“The companies on this list demonstrate just how much the small-business sector impacts the economies of each Midwest state,” says Inc. editor in chief Scott Omelianuk. “Across every single industry, these businesses have posted revenue and growth rates that are beyond impressive, further proving the tenacity of their founders and CEOs.”

‍About The Negotiator Guru

‍The Negotiator Guru is the leading advisory firm for Salesforce contract negotiation. Our team of Senior IT Sourcing Experts provides industry leading IT contract negotiation services for a global client base. Clients engage us to source, negotiate, and manage highly complex IT contracts, transactions and suppliers. Through our deep business understanding and senior expert negotiation skills, we work closely with clients to deliver immediate and long-lasting financial impact to all stakeholders.

Founded in 2015, The Negotiator Guru is a private company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota. For more information, visit www.thenegotiator.guru. More about Inc. and the Inc.

5000 Regional Series

‍Methodology

‍The 2020 Inc. 5000 Regional Series is ranked according to percentage revenue growth when comparing 2016 and 2018. To qualify, companies must have been founded and generating revenue by March 31, 2016. They had to be U.S.-based, privately held, for profit, and independent—not subsidiaries or divisions of other companies—as of December 31, 2018. (Since then, a number of companies on the list have gone public or been acquired.) The minimum revenue required for 2016 is $100,000; the minimum for 2018 is $1 million. As always, Inc. reserves the right to decline applicants for subjective reasons.

Ready to explore joining the TNG family?

‍Contact us today to set-up a client intake assessment where we identify your cost savings opportunity for free!

------------------------------------------------------------------

Explore other TNG Featured Articles, Follow The Negotiator Guru on LinkedIn, Follow Dan Kelly on LinkedIn and Twitter. Learn more about What We Do.

‍About Inc. Media

‍The world’s most trusted business-media brand, Inc. offers entrepreneurs the knowledge, tools, connections, and community to build great companies. Its award-winning multiplatform content reaches more than 50 million people each month across a variety of channels including websites, newsletters, social media, podcasts, and print. Its prestigious Inc. 5000 list, produced every year since 1982, analyzes company data to recognize the fastest-growing privately held businesses in the United States. The global recognition that comes with inclusion in the 5000 gives the founders of the best businesses an opportunity to engage with an exclusive community of their peers, and the credibility that helps them drive sales and recruit talent. The associated Inc. 5000 Conference is part of a highly acclaimed portfolio of bespoke events produced by Inc. For more information, visit www.inc.com.

Why are Companies Hesitant to Engage Outside Consultants?

Why is it that companies are sometimes resistant to engaging with a cost savings firm like The Negotiator Guru (TNG)? Furthermore, why is it that a company refuses to engage with an advisory firm (like TNG) after they know there is a guaranteed ROI? Is there any rational reason for this or is it purely an emotional response?We at TNG find ourselves asking these questions far too often…

We know humans can be complicated (😊), but we wanted to dig deeper into what sometimes appears to be irrational behavior that negates shareholder value creation opportunities. As a result, we conducted ethnographic research on the cause of this behavior with the intent of identifying key trends, by persona. Here are a few of the key insights we discovered:

IT Leadership (CIO, VP of IT, etc.) fears they will hurt the relationship with the software publisher/service provider leading to service degradation.
Purchasing/Procurement/Sourcing representatives have huge egos and thrive on taking credit internally. Furthermore, they are worried about their job security if someone else can achieve a greater result.
CFOs think they only way to achieve such savings is by changing vendors (ex: Salesforce to Microsoft) or by cutting products/services.
Business leadership think it will take too much time to achieve the prospective savings which will negate the realized ROI.
Executives at publicly traded companies are generally risk adverse and think it’s safer to use a big 4 consulting firm (that’s already “in the system”) even though they will likely cost more and achieve much less (since they’re a generalist vs. specialist).

We’ve heard different variations of these key objections for years. What makes us most proud is that some of this feedback came from a few of our past clientele who decided to overcome their natural resistance as they knew what was best for their organization. Per the recommendation of these past customer respondents, we've outlined what they experienced (vs. initial perceived resistance):

Vendor Relationship – While it may be slightly uncomfortable at the beginning (depending on how much Right Sizing and/or Right Pricing opportunities TNG identifies), the vendor relationship and service quality improves at the conclusion of the TNG engagement. The vendor is engaged with the customer in a strategic manner and the customer can now feel confident they are only paying for what they need at a fair price.
Procurement Job Security – TNG acts like a force multiplier for existing Procurement teams. As such, TNG simply seeks to enable high impact results vs. seek credit.
Vendor/Product Change – Vendor changes are extremely rare. TNG simply identifies how internal stakeholders use the respective software platform (via their proprietary persona analysis) and identifies cost savings opportunities without sacrificing functionality/service quality.
Time/Cost to Achieve – Internal business stakeholders are rarely involved in the process after the Discovery phase is complete.
Niche vs. Generalist – The speed and consistency in which TNG can delivery results is a direct result of their focus and dedication focusing on their core competency, such as Salesforce.

Interestingly, our analysis identified the following key insights regarding business leaders' intention for engaging an outside advisory firm (summarized for brevity):

IT Leadership sometimes feel uncomfortable being the “tough voice,” so they hire a 3rd party who brings the credentials to speak from an authoritative position.
C-Suite Executives simply want to motivate (prove to) their Procurement/Business Teams that the “great deal on the table” is not so great after all.
Procurement leadership wants to be armed with accurate price benchmarking or contract term knowledge. They recognize they can’t be experts in everything and value niche expertise from specialists vs. generalists.
Board members want to do anything possible to reinforce their fiduciary duty to their shareholders…this includes identifying, and executing on, every available cost savings opportunity.
Contract negotiators want to understand the software publisher’s sales playbook and internal incentive process…not just general market intelligence.

We hope that you find these key insights helpful as you contemplate and reflect on your own personal resistance to engaging an outside advisory firm. TNG prides itself to make every engagement as risk-free as possible for our clients. Furthermore, TNG will only accept a client if we know there is a major impact opportunity…if not, we will simply give you some free advice. Ready to explore joining the TNG family? Contact us today to set-up a client intake assessment where we identify your cost savings opportunity for free!

Understanding how Salesforce Negotiates in 2026