Why are Companies Hesitant to Engage Outside Consultants?

Why is it that companies are sometimes resistant to engaging with a cost savings firm like The Negotiator Guru (TNG)? Furthermore, why is it that a company refuses to engage with an advisory firm (like TNG) after they know there is a guaranteed ROI? Is there any rational reason for this or is it purely an emotional response?We at TNG find ourselves asking these questions far too often…
We know humans can be complicated (😊), but we wanted to dig deeper into what sometimes appears to be irrational behavior that negates shareholder value creation opportunities. As a result, we conducted ethnographic research on the cause of this behavior with the intent of identifying key trends, by persona. Here are a few of the key insights we discovered:
- IT Leadership (CIO, VP of IT, etc.) fears they will hurt the relationship with the software publisher/service provider leading to service degradation.
 - Purchasing/Procurement/Sourcing representatives have huge egos and thrive on taking credit internally. Furthermore, they are worried about their job security if someone else can achieve a greater result.
 - CFOs think they only way to achieve such savings is by changing vendors (ex: Salesforce to Microsoft) or by cutting products/services.
 - Business leadership think it will take too much time to achieve the prospective savings which will negate the realized ROI.
 - Executives at publicly traded companies are generally risk adverse and think it’s safer to use a big 4 consulting firm (that’s already “in the system”) even though they will likely cost more and achieve much less (since they’re a generalist vs. specialist).
 
We’ve heard different variations of these key objections for years. What makes us most proud is that some of this feedback came from a few of our past clientele who decided to overcome their natural resistance as they knew what was best for their organization. Per the recommendation of these past customer respondents, we've outlined what they experienced (vs. initial perceived resistance):
- Vendor Relationship – While it may be slightly uncomfortable at the beginning (depending on how much Right Sizing and/or Right Pricing opportunities TNG identifies), the vendor relationship and service quality improves at the conclusion of the TNG engagement. The vendor is engaged with the customer in a strategic manner and the customer can now feel confident they are only paying for what they need at a fair price.
 - Procurement Job Security – TNG acts like a force multiplier for existing Procurement teams. As such, TNG simply seeks to enable high impact results vs. seek credit.
 - Vendor/Product Change – Vendor changes are extremely rare. TNG simply identifies how internal stakeholders use the respective software platform (via their proprietary persona analysis) and identifies cost savings opportunities without sacrificing functionality/service quality.
 - Time/Cost to Achieve – Internal business stakeholders are rarely involved in the process after the Discovery phase is complete.
 - Niche vs. Generalist – The speed and consistency in which TNG can delivery results is a direct result of their focus and dedication focusing on their core competency, such as Salesforce.
 
Interestingly, our analysis identified the following key insights regarding business leaders' intention for engaging an outside advisory firm (summarized for brevity):
- IT Leadership sometimes feel uncomfortable being the “tough voice,” so they hire a 3rd party who brings the credentials to speak from an authoritative position.
 - C-Suite Executives simply want to motivate (prove to) their Procurement/Business Teams that the “great deal on the table” is not so great after all.
 - Procurement leadership wants to be armed with accurate price benchmarking or contract term knowledge. They recognize they can’t be experts in everything and value niche expertise from specialists vs. generalists.
 - Board members want to do anything possible to reinforce their fiduciary duty to their shareholders…this includes identifying, and executing on, every available cost savings opportunity.
 - Contract negotiators want to understand the software publisher’s sales playbook and internal incentive process…not just general market intelligence.
 
We hope that you find these key insights helpful as you contemplate and reflect on your own personal resistance to engaging an outside advisory firm. TNG prides itself to make every engagement as risk-free as possible for our clients. Furthermore, TNG will only accept a client if we know there is a major impact opportunity…if not, we will simply give you some free advice. Ready to explore joining the TNG family? Contact us today to set-up a client intake assessment where we identify your cost savings opportunity for free!
More resources
From Fortune 500 giants to fast-growing innovators, TNG has helped clients save 20% – 40%+ on enterprise software contracts — even when they thought it was impossible

5 Tips for Negotiating a Salesforce Extension
In this article we will discuss how to successfully extend your current Salesforce contract in order to create additional time to successfully prepare and negotiate your renewal agreement. For more detail, read our guide on negotiating with Salesforce.
An extension is commonly needed whenever our clients engage us too late (i.e. too close to their contract renewal) and we need time to successfully complete the Discovery and Strategy Phases of our proprietary 4-Step Negotiation Plan.
Tip #1: Be Confident
We find that most of our clients have either rarely or never requested a contract extension with either Salesforce or any other IT Supplier. As such, this very basic concept becomes daunting for the average IT or Procurement leader as they don’t have either the experience, or past playbook, to execute with natural confidence. This sentiment is augmented by the fact that Salesforce will automatically inform you that they never allow extensions. If you’ve read our previous articles, then you’ll know this is yet another canned answer out of their sales playbook. Please know that extensions are granted all the time as long as you know how to ask for them…as such, they are considered the exception vs. the rule.
Tip #2: Focus on the Facts
Share only what is necessary with Salesforce without going into too much detail. You don’t want to expend all of your negotiation equity during this process or you’ll end up hurting yourself down the road. Keep in mind that Salesforce will try and obtain as much information as possible during this stage so they can decide 1) whether or not to grant the extension and 2) to determine how prepared you are as an organization.
Tip #3: Establish the Why
Like any human scenario, it’s always easier to influence people if they understand the intent and context behind any request. This scenario is no different as you’ll want to answer in a way that is authentic to your organization but intentionally vague in material content. Typical responses we find most effective are the following:
- Active interest in exploring new digital capabilities and need time to make internal decisions;
 - Internally restructuring the Salesforce relationship accountability;
 
- Aligning multiple stakeholders within your organization to accurately capture the wants and needs over the next 5 years;
 - In the process of obtaining end user feedback and need some additional time to finalize, analyze, and make decisions, etc.
 
Tip #4: Create a Timeline with Milestones
Salesforce will be far more willing to accept an extension request if they understand the timeline in which you plan on making decisions. This in a sense shows a partnership mentality which is both real and healthy. Develop a basic timeline of when you plan on making internal and external decisions that provides a good amount of cushion in favor of your organization.
Tip #5: Keep your Promises
Constant and honest communication is key. All too often we find individuals/companies making the mistake of playing the power client position. In other words, the client exemplifies a lack of empathy or care for the sales process and holds all information back thinking that they are protecting their position. After years of research and proven experience we have repeatedly disproven that hypothesis. Instead, we find providing regular milestone updates to Salesforce (or any IT supplier) shows a level of commitment to the relationship and will pay dividends at the final negotiated deal. Summary It’s important to recognize that each client scenario offers its unique challenges and opportunity. That being said, the guiding principles laid out above will prove effective no matter your situation. Be confident in your request, focus on the facts of your specific situation, build credibility with Salesforce by providing context into the request, set expectations via timeline with milestones, and deliver on your promises. We use these same effective tactics every day and hope you find them useful in your future endeavors.

Key Points to Remember When Negotiating Your Salesforce Master Subscription
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) has become one of the most expensive IT investments for organizations around the world according to the annual “IT Trends Study” conducted by the Society of Information Management. 
This IT investment growth is being fueled by two primary industry drivers:
- Large organizations are both replacing homegrown systems as well as utilizing their CRM platform to further connect their internal and external stakeholders, processes, and communication strategies; and,
 - Small to medium-sized organizations are rapidly acquiring this technology to make a positive step-change in their customer interactions and client prospecting.
 
While there are many Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) CRM platforms to choose from in the marketplace today, Salesforce continues to dominate the space. Subsequently, if you are looking at CRM solutions in the marketplace, you’re likely considering Salesforce as an option.
Why is Salesforce (SFDC) the market leader and what makes it different than the others?
While this article is not intended to be a tactical comparison of CRM solutions available today, our vast experience and focus on Salesforce naturally has revealed a few key points:
- SFDC has been, and continues to be, very strong in outbound and inbound marketing tactics;
 - SFDC arguably was the first mover in defining a SaaS CRM solution that is decoupled from any other large enterprise agreement (ex: Microsoft, Oracle, etc.) making it easier to obtain;
 - SFDC developed a buying channel that is direct to a business end-user vs. going through a channel partner/value added reseller (VAR);
 - SFDC was founded with the intent of truly being a platform where vertical applications could easily connect and integrate (like the Apple App Store); and,
 - SFDC has perfected the sales process inside of organizations in a way that their divide and conquer sales tactics commonly identifies continues growth opportunities across the organization.
 
Why is negotiating a Salesforce agreement so difficult?
The funny thing is that the entire go-to-market model of SFDC makes it very easy to acquire licenses as needed. This is in fact one of the many elements that make negotiating with SFDC difficult. In other words, very often our clients come to us after they have identified SFDC has spread throughout their organization without their knowledge and/or with very little governance. Our clients often describe this situation similar to an “internal virus” (their words, not ours) that spreads organically at a very fast pace. The result of this unmanaged growth can lead to the following (by no means comprehensive):
- Little to no license asset management leading to “shelfware” (acquisition of more licenses than are being used);
 - Incorrect license purchase creating higher costs than needed;
 - Different monthly subscription fees for the same license type;
 - Lack of an enterprise agreement leading to contractual risk (etc.);
 - No defined growth or utilization strategy; and;
 - A platform that is very difficult to disengage which drastically increases the internal cost of
 - change.
 
CIOs and IT Procurement leaders often find it difficult to negotiate a more favorable agreement when renewing their SFDC agreement.
We find the following to be the primary drivers:
- Like other very well-known and established software companies, SFDC has developed a sales process that is very difficult to crack if you don’t deal with them every day (like we do); Find out more about this here.
 - The standard SFDC SaaS contract allows for SFDC to introduce price adjustments at any time;
 - If a client is reducing their license count, SFDC’s standard contracts permit higher per unit pricing;
 - SFDC sales leadership and staff are highly motivated to continuously drive revenue growth at existing clients;
- To be explicitly clear about this, if a client’s contract is renewed with flat revenue, this is a very negative reflection on your account management team;
 
 - SFDC licenses are constantly changing; and,
 - SFDC account management changes (by design) every 6 – 18 months which naturally negates knowledge continuity, etc.
 

4 Key Steps to Successfully Prepare for a Salesforce Negotiation
Here are a few quick steps to prepare for your Salesforce negotiation:
1. Assemble a best-in-class negotiation team  
Including an expert negotiator in your team can help you acquire the most reasonable Salesforce subscription agreement. As discussed in previous articles, Salesforce is an expert at “divide and conquer” sales tactics.
As such, they will be looking to speak with different stakeholders at all levels of your business with the intent of gaining as much intelligence about your needs as possible. To properly prepare for, and counter, these tactics we recommend establishing a negotiation team 6 months prior to any planned contract renewal/execution. Within this team you should include business, souring, and legal stakeholders that have decision-making authority on behalf of your organization. As part of the planning process, the negotiation team should create a working group of business stakeholders that can provide inputs into the needs and wants of the organization.
2. Perform a thorough review of the current contract prior to renewal
Part of our standard client onboarding process is a meticulous review of their current contract. While this may seem like common sense, it’s amazing how many prospective clients we speak with that never think of conducting this initial due diligence. Since our entire team originated from large organizations, we actually understand why this happens…initiative overload! Before we accept a new client, we ask them whether or not they have reviewed their current contract to determine if they actually received the products/services that were under contract within the current term. On average, only about 35% actually completed this step prior to engaging our firm. After we conduct the analysis, we on average find that 60% of our clients do not actually receive/activate the products/services that they pre-paid for as part of their original contract negotiation. Subsequently, we suggest you review all special contract terms that are part of your expiring agreement that may impact your contract renewal (i.e. price protection, etc.).
3. Prepare for a Proactive Negotiation
A proactive negotiation can enhance your leverage with Salesforce. As stated earlier, we recommend a 6-month runway to ensure the most leverage. If you are a renewing customer, Salesforce will generally start engaging your business stakeholders 3-4 months prior to your natural renewal date. Getting ahead of this stakeholder engagement will only help your organization. To ensure organization, we suggest developing a communication plan that directly advises each level of the organization what to expect, what to say, and when to say it.
4. Negotiate a 3-year TCO
Our clients commonly come to us asking about what price they should be paying for a specific product or service. Through years of experience, we advise clients to focus on the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for the entire contract instead of becoming fixated on a specific line item on the proposal. Like many other major software companies, Salesforce incentivizes its sales reps differently depending on the product or service. Instead of becoming fixated on a specific price point for a Sales Cloud license we suggest focusing on the net contract value. In other words, identify a TCO that you are comfortable with from a price-to-value standpoint and focus on driving the most value for your needs within that spectrum. We commonly obtain a 10 – 15% value increase by negotiating a net TCO vs. that of a line item rate basis. This, of course, is easier said than done but we wanted to share this facts-based article for you to consider as you embark on your Salesforce negotiation.

