IT Software

IT Software Case Study

Client Name/Size/Sector:

  • Company Name Confidential
  • $15+ Billion Annual Revenue
  • 5K+ Employees
  • Financial Services

Supplier:

  • Salesforce

Engagement Type:

  • Client engaged “The Negotiator Guru” (firm) to deliver IT Strategic Sourcing Advisory Services to a specific business unit.  
Picture

Problem:

  • While the client had a centralized procurement department (good thing), there was very little support from the IT department. In other words, the IT department operated independently and did not trust the client’s procurement department.  
  • The client did not have a centralized spend visibility tool  
  • Note: The client had SAP as their primary ERP system but was not able to accurately identify spend across regions as a result of poor reporting from the tool.  
  • The client’s IT spend is broken between global and regional budgets depending on the application.  

Activities:

  • Identified current state contracts across the globe
  • Identified both influencing and decision-making stakeholders within IT and the Business Units that utilized similar software packages.  
  • Coordinated global business units and stakeholder meetings to discuss opportunity, gather feedback, and drive results.
  • Utilized proprietary tools, templates, and techniques to assign global roles & responsibilities, action items, and negotiation tactics in the interest of speaking from one voice.  

Results:

  • Client Savings: $13 Million
  • Negotiated the agreement down from $25 Million to $12 Million for a 3-year contract.
  • Even though the firm was retained to focus only on a specific business unit, we identified cost savings opportunities that benefited multiple business units across the organization.  ​

See More Case Studies

From Phoenix to Tokyo, we turn impossible vendor demands into client victories.

Contract Consolidation Post-Merger

Client Profile

A national healthcare provider with 10+ facilities undergoing post-merger integration of systems and vendor contracts.

Challenge

Multiple overlapping software and infrastructure contracts (some with auto-renewal clauses and duplicative pricing) created an estimated $5M in redundant spend and significant compliance risk across entities.

TNG Solution

  • Conducted a full post-merger contract risk assessment.
  • Identified conflicting licensing terms and misaligned SLAs across vendors.
  • Renegotiated bundled agreements, centralized governance rights, and aligned pricing to true usage.

Outcome

Eliminated $5.3M in redundant costs and created a centralized contract framework that mitigated legal exposure while ensuring scalability for future growth.

SaaS Contract Optimization

Client Profile

A Fortune 100 big-box retailer implementing a multi-year rollout of a cloud-based workforce management platform across 1,200 locations.

Challenge

Vendor’s original SaaS contract included non-negotiable annual price escalators, unscalable support fees, and unrestricted termination clauses, leading to a potential $14M overcommitment.

TNG Solution

  • Conducted a clause-by-clause risk audit.
  • Introduced performance-based renewal language, capped escalators, and tiered user thresholds.

Outcome

Negotiated total contract value down by $6.8M, implemented enforceable performance guarantees, and secured rights to re-negotiate upon key business changes.

SAP Indirect Access & Audit Exposure

Client Profile

A publicly traded global logistics company with over 30,000 employees and a complex SAP landscape.

Challenge

SAP alleged the client owed $9.6M in retroactive fees due to indirect access violations following an internal audit. The client had signed an outdated license agreement that left them fully exposed.

TNG Solution

  • Performed a forensic risk analysis of the original SAP contract and audit report.
  • Identified outdated metrics, ambiguous user definitions, and license overlap.
  • Negotiated a new licensing model that eliminated indirect access exposure and established a future-proof digital access clause.

Outcome

Reduced SAP’s claim from $9.6M to $0 and negotiated a forward licensing strategy that saved the client $7.2M over five years.