The Difference Between Gartner & The Negotiator Guru

Gartner, at its core, is a market intelligence firm. It uses a wide-angle lens to give you a big-picture view of market and industry trends. You can use their data as general negotiation guidance and add their toolkits to your own.
There is absolutely value in this broad-stroke model but it can be limiting when it comes to looking for data and resources that more specifically mirror the size and needs of your organization.
In this article, I want to outline the similarities and differences between a simple market intelligence firm approach and a niche service provider approach. There are many reasons you might want to research best practices from a 30,000-foot view as well as dive deeper at a 5,000-foot view.
Many of my clients will use both Gartner’s and The Negotiator Guru’s (TNG) services to achieve the best results for their companies.
The graphic below gives a basic overview of the similarities and differences between our companies and we’ll break each one down in this article.

There Are Some Similarities Between Gartner & The Negotiator Guru
Both Gartner and TNG provide information on market and industry trends as well as general guidance on IT Cost Optimization. We have each developed our own toolkits to strategically approach each client’s needs. We overlap when it comes to providing general guidance to CIO’s.
Our companies also both provide rate benchmark data although, as you’ll read below, we go about this in different ways. Gartner has quite a bit of data they provide in aggregated terms which is useful but, without isolating the information by industry or annual spend or similar categories, it can be difficult for CIOs and their supporting functions to narrow down actionable intelligence that is defensible and realistic.
There Are Many Differences Between Gartner & The Negotiator Guru
The keyword I would use to describe the services Gartner and TNG have in common is ‘general.’ Gartner is a great resource for general information across a wide array of topics but rarely provides niche depth that our customers are longing to consume.
In contrast, TNG has a deep and disciplined focus within the IT Software vertical which enables our team to share actionable insights that are localized, specific, and highly relevant to our clients. In fact, it was our early clients that helped shaped this disciplined focus as they made their niche needs clearly known to our team. Due to our outstanding client family, TNG has been on a journey to fill our clients’ market intelligence needs for specific supplier relationships. This has organically driven our firm to be the worldwide leader in Salesforce Contract Negotiation Advisory Services which typically is 80% of our work portfolio at any given time.
With the average cost of a Gartner subscription being $30,000 per seat, plus additional consulting costs in order to receive personalized advisory services, it’s worth your while to be informed on what they can and cannot help you achieve.
Because we provide specialized data and consulting services, we’re able to dig deeper into our clients’ businesses and tailor our process to better achieve the results they’re looking for.
The following are a few of the specific areas The Negotiator Guru differs from Gartner in terms of what services and results we can offer our clients.
Right Size
While Gartner has a wealth of industry data and information, it can be nearly impossible for a client to look at the data and isolate a specific instance to best compare themselves to their peers. This leaves clients feeling informed but uncomfortable about how this information is applicable, and more importantly defensible, within their environment.
In certain circumstances, Gartner will provide “best in class” rates for a specific digital capability or service portfolio. One would argue that this provides directionally correct price targets to use as a market intelligence within their supplier negotiation. We generally agree, however, it’s important to note that your software sales executive (or worse yet your internal colleagues) will very quickly share with you that you don’t fit the profile of those rates for XYZ reason. We know this because we’ve been in these conversations on countless occasions.
In the rare case that you obtain “best in class” rate information for your specific topic of interest, you are still missing a critical piece of knowledge which we call our “Right Size” guidance. Using conservative figures, there is a 15-20% value-capture opportunity just by applying Right Size practices to your research and internal analysis before entering into any IT contract negotiation
Our supplier-specific expertise is one of the biggest contributors to this Right Sizing approach.
Within our Discovery Phase, we take an inventory of your current products and licenses and match them against your actual business needs. Almost always, we find that our clients are over licensed and have shelfware within their environment. This is an example of Right Sizing.
From a Right Pricing standpoint, not only do we understand “best in class” rates, we localize price targets based on industry, client size, and contract value. This enables our clients to feel 100% confident about the market intelligence as we’re benchmarking their rates against that of their likesize industry peers.
To expand upon this difference, we’ll use our expertise in Salesforce as an example.
As raised and validated by leading consulting and intelligence firms, TNG has the most comprehensive database of Salesforce rates in the world. This capability allows our team to quickly and easily perform a price benchmarking exercise for our clients. In many instances, we’ll inform prospective clients that their rates are within an acceptable margin of their “Right Price” benchmark and that the only real opportunity (if any) is to pursue “Right Sizing” inside of their environment. At TNG, our culture and client centric values direct our work and guide us to only accept prospective clients where we know with certainty there is a strong potential to drive huge impact.

Being able to combine Right Price and Right Size analysis will have a significant impact on the effectiveness of your supplier negotiation strategies.
Contract Language Risks
As a result of our deep supplier-specific expertise, our team on average analyzes 5 - 15 software contracts per day. As a result, we know what’s “normal” with all of the large enterprise software platforms and any common risks that are inserted unbeknownst to our clients. By doing this every single day, our team is easily able to identify commonly-used, ambiguous language that always favors the supplier.
Large software companies know their customers rarely spend time analyzing terms and conditions within their contracts. Furthermore, the widely accepted principle of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) leads clients to believe the terms are standard and unchangeable.
Unfortunately, this simply isn’t true. As part of our Contract Execution Phase, we conduct a deep dive assessment of our client’s supplier contract as part of our standard service (another major difference from Gartner). To put the impact of this added service into context, our team identifies a unique contractual risk within SaaS contracts alone 33% of the time. If the contract we are analyzing is not a SaaS contract, contractual risks are identified, on average, 85% of the time. Knowing what to look for in each supplier’s contract language helps our clients avoid common pitfalls and supplier-centric renegotiation strategies.
Sales Playbook Coaching
Another key difference between taking a general approach on market intelligence (Gartner) vs. a software specific deep niche (TNG) is the ability to learn and leverage the sales playbook(s) for these large enterprise suppliers. It may not surprise you that within the most successful software sales organizations are repeatable and prescriptive sales playbooks that guide the near robotic actions of their sales representatives.
As a result of learning these sales playbooks we are literally able to tell our clients the moves their suppliers are going to take next. This intelligence allows us to be one step ahead within the negotiation process while leveraging the interests of both parties.
While the art of negotiation is an art and not a science, arming yourself with this intelligence allows you to deploy counterintelligence strategies inside of your organization (to counteract common supplier tactics such as divide and conquer) while also proactively preparing counterpoints to their foreseeable arguments. As a result, our clients commonly tell us that they were the most prepared they have ever been before, during, and after a negotiation.
Advisory and Execution Services
We don’t just tell you what is possible. We help you achieve it.
The biggest criticism most companies have of typical market intelligence and/or management consulting firms is that they’ll tell you what “best in class” looks like but will leave you to figure out how to achieve it within your organization. If they do offer advisory services that help you implement their “best in class” then it will be for additional fees that eat away at the cost savings potential, etc.
We’re a full, beginning-to-end provider who will help you all the way through to the execution of the contract..
At TNG, we not only share a “best in class” picture but also create a realistic future state localized for your business. We help you implement that future state while also limiting risks to your organization long after our engagement ends. This is all part of our standard duty of care for our clients.
4-Step Negotiation Process
Our proprietary 4-step negotiation process allows us to deliver a clear and consistent service to our clients. In the interest of brevity we won’t go into detail of what each step entails, however, please know that within the Discovery and Strategy steps you will walk away with a forward looking roadmap as part of the overall engagement. If even offered, this would be an extra advisory fee from Gartner and/or any other market intelligence and/or management consulting firm.
The graphic below quickly outlines our negotiation process:

Compensation & Fees
Our compensation for these services is also entirely different from Gartner’s method.
As mentioned above, Gartner’s average subscription rate is $30,000 per person plus any additional consulting fees.
With this package, you have access to their standard publications, toolkits, and potentially a limited number of “analyst calls” which are quick conversations with the author of the publications. Any additional advisory assistance, if even possible, comes as an upcharge. Even with this additional cost, you will be on your own from an execution standpoint.

We charge either an Advisory Fee based on annual contract value or we offer a Pay Per Performance option with a simple baseline calculation.
We don’t charge based on a subscription service to our articles, we provide all this information for free.
Our rates contain no hidden charges or surprise upsells. On top of that, we’ll help you execute the strategies we develop with you.
We’re incredibly transparent with how we price our services and our clients never question the value they achieved from engaging with TNG.
Combining a Broad Overview Approach with a Specialized, Niche Consulting Firm is a Winning Equation
One of the questions we hear frequently is whether someone can/should work with both Gartner AND The Negotiator Guru.
The answer is yes!
Gartner provides a lot of good, general information. TNG helps you zoom in on the information that is most relevant to your organization so you can determine which key findings are critical for driving cost savings/avoidance while lowering your contractual risk.
Gartner is a market intelligence research firm that has a very limited advisory component separate from their articles. They do not generally provide execution services.
TNG provides information without a subscription fee and our advisory and execution services are provided in the same package.
Bringing in TNG to help you pinpoint your specific needs, value capture opportunities, and execution strategies will provide immediate and long-term intrinsic value for your organization. Remember, TNG will only accept you as a client if there is clear and distinct net positive impact potential… well, we can’t speak for the other guys.
More resources
From Fortune 500 giants to fast-growing innovators, TNG has helped clients save 20% – 40%+ on enterprise software contracts — even when they thought it was impossible

How to Create a Salesforce Roadmap
In previous articles, we shared with you how the Salesforce machine operates. We shared with you how it structures its organization and the tactics it uses to maximize its revenue from your company.In this article, we are going to dive into your single most important weapon against Salesforce in your negotiation . . . Your Salesforce Roadmap.
What is a Salesforce Roadmap?
Simply put, a Salesforce Roadmap is nothing more than a table outlining:
- What you are going to buy
- When you are going to buy it
This sounds simple, yet most companies don’t go into a negotiation with Salesforce clear on these two points. As a result, Salesforce hijacks the conversation and creates a roadmap for them.
What you are going to buy
This question isn’t always as simple as it sounds.
Do you need Enterprise or Unlimited?
Do you even need premium support? Or would that money be better spent on a 3rd party consulting firm?
Have you run a utilization report to see how many of your licenses are actually being used?
Is marketing actually using that instance of Pardot you purchased three years ago?
The “what you are going to buy” conversation isn’t always easy. One company we worked with ran a utilization report to find that only 63% of their licenses had even been logged into in the past year. This means they were paying for 37% more licenses than they actually needed!
Another customer realized that a large portion of his organization could get by through downgrading to a lower license level. They were only using basic features that didn’t require them to be at the Unlimited License.
It’s easy to think you know exactly what you need going into a negotiation, but sometimes you need to do a bit more digging into understanding how each department actually utilizes the tool.
When you are going to buy it
Another common tactic Salesforce uses is to tell you that you cannot roll out licenses over the course of a three-year contract. Your rep will tell you that you need to buy them all up front now if you want to get a discount.
This ironically always works out in Salesforce’s favor as the added revenue from those dormant licenses makes up for the discount one rates. The truth is you can negotiate to roll out licenses at set periods of time throughout your negotiation.
In order to do this though, you need a clear roadmap and to create confidence with Salesforce that this is what you actually need and when you need it.
Why Is Building a Salesforce Roadmap So Important?
Before we dive into how to create this roadmap, let’s first dive into explaining why this roadmap is so important.
A roadmap is your best defense against divide and conquer
Remember the divide and conquer tactics we described in our guide on negotiating with Salesforce? We shared with you how Salesforce will make contact with multiple individuals and decision-makers throughout your organization.
Its goal with divide and conquer is to create conflicting stories which develop chaos in terms of what you actually need.
Creating your own Salesforce Roadmap helps you prevent against that.
When you create a roadmap and get buy-in from all your key stakeholders on that same roadmap, you create alignment within your organization. In addition to the roadmap, we are also going to give your internal stakeholders key talking points on what to say if Salesforce approaches them. It’s also important to know that timing is everything with regards to these key messages.
As a result of being aligned on talking points and what your organization actually needs, your organization begins to speak from one voice. Instead of having Salesforce gather conflicting stories from each department, they suddenly are left dumbfounded when they receive the same story from all contacts within the organization.
Flip-flopping your wants in the negotiation focuses the discussion on the wrong things
Whenever you don’t have your roadmap aligned, you spend your time in the negotiation with your rep going back and forth on how many licenses you need or what add-ons you do or don’t want.
Every time you go to your rep with a revision on your renewal because you and your team changed your mind, you are wasting a valuable chance to negotiate a key term or reduce your rates.
Without a roadmap, you will end up flip-flopping on what you want during the negotiation and spend your time focused on what licenses you are even going to buy instead of the price point or the terms. The entire negotiation gets focused on just figuring out what you need instead of getting you the best rates.
Your roadmap creates that clarity and alignment and lets you spend your time focused on getting you the best deal.
A lack of alignment undermines the key contact of the negotiation
Imagine for a moment that you are a Salesforce rep. You go into conversation with the Salesforce Admin who is your main point of contact in the negotiation. The Salesforce Admin request a 20% license count increase but is not interested in adding any new products or expanding their Salesforce footprint into any new departments.
Then two days later, your sales management team comes back from a basketball game with the CEO of your client organization. They tell you “we just met with the CEO, he wants to roll Salesforce out to his entire marketing department as well.”
As a Sales rep, you immediately jump to the conclusion that your Salesforce Admin is not the authority or decision-maker on this account. All respect you had for this Salesforce Admin’s decision-making ability has gone out the window.
As a result, that Sales rep treats the Salesforce Admin differently in the negotiation. He starts going around them and maximizing his divide and conquer tactics because he knows the Salesforce Admin is not in charge.
This is what happens when your organization is not aligned.
It undermines the individual who is the face of the negotiation. It doesn’t matter if it is a Salesforce Admin, CIO, or CFO.
Alignment and a roadmap gives power to the negotiator
Let us imagine another scenario for a moment here. Imagine that you are a Salesforce rep. You go into a conversation with your Salesforce Admin who is your main point of contact. The Salesforce Admin tells you they want to increase sales cloud licenses by 20% and consider a demo of Pardot in their marketing department.
Then two days later, your sales management team comes back from a basketball game with the client CEO. They tell you “we just met with the CEO, he wants to grow his licenses by 20% and is considering expanding Pardot into their marketing department.”
As a Sales Rep, you just heard consistency.
You heard that your Salesforce Admin is aligned with the CEO.
You heard that your Salesforce Admin is actually in charge of this negotiation.
When you have organizational alignment on your roadmap, it gives power to whoever is running your Salesforce Negotiation. It doesn’t matter of it is the Director of IT, CIO, or CFO. Whenever you have that alignment of stories, it gives that person in the negotiating seat power to drive the negotiation on their own.
When to Create your Salesforce Roadmap
We typically recommend companies start building their roadmap six to nine months prior to their negotiation. You are going to want at least three months to handle the actual negotiation with Salesforce so a six month runway gives you an additional three months to get that internal alignment.
Each organization is different, but that internal alignment won’t happen overnight. Give yourself some time to meet with all key stakeholders and achieve that internal alignment.
Three Steps to Creating your Salesforce Roadmap
A Salesforce Roadmap is not complicated. It is a simple table of “what you need” and “when you need it” over the next three to five years.
Even though most Salesforce renewals are only three years, it is helpful to plan five years in advance so you can think of a bigger picture of what may be coming down the line. This helps you in creating an aligned story for Salesforce at your renewal.
Step 1) Create a rough draft alone
If you are reading this, chances are you are the one who is driving the Salesforce negotiation. You have extensive knowledge of Salesforce and can probably fill out 80% of the roadmap on your own.
The key in this step is to document all of your ideas for the roadmap on paper.
You don’t want to go to your key stakeholders with a blank slate and build the roadmap from scratch together. That is not a good use of their time, and it is going to create too much debate.
By crystallizing your thoughts about Salesforce into a rough draft of the roadmap, you can share that document with others. It becomes a starting point for the entire roadmap discussion.
Step 2) Take the rough draft to key stakeholders for feedback
This rough draft of the roadmap is purely for internal use. Once you have this rough draft complete you are going to present this document, typically in the form of a PowerPoint presentation, to your key stakeholders within the organization.
This may be your CEO, CFO, CIO, COO, VP of Sales, Director of IT, Salesforce Admin, Sales Management Team, etc.
You are going to take this roadmap to them and say “This is what I believe our 3-5 year Salesforce roadmap looks like...what feedback do you have?”
As you go into these meetings you may find yourself saying, “I have an idea here but I don’t know exactly what X department needs.” This roadmap and these conversations are meant to help you refine the roadmap and clarify those needs with each department in the organization.
What is great about this step of the process is that this allows your team to have internal dialogues about what you need with Salesforce. Without doing this internal roadmap, these contacts would not be brought into the conversation until a contact from Salesforce had reached out to them.
Instead of letting Salesforce guide these conversations, you are getting in front of them and taking charge. This helps you own and drive the conversation.
Step 3) Gather all feedback and refine your roadmap
Once you have gathered alignment from each of your key stakeholders on the roadmap, you are going to want to take some time to sit down and refine that roadmap into a final polished version.
At this point, you are almost ready for entering the negotiation. But before that we need to build a communication strategy and negotiation plan.
Lastly, it's also important to realize that a Salesforce Roadmap is essential for SELA Agreements (Salesforce Enterprise License agreements). Read our guide for more details on how to renegotiate your SELA Agreement.

Confidential Clients: Why We Do It
For those of you wondering why we keep all of our clients confidential, our Founder and Senior Partner Dan Kelly provided a few key insights as part of a recent interview. We hope you appreciate learning why this is such an important guiding principle for TNG.
Moderator: Keeping your clients confidential is a pretty bold and respectable move… Why does TNG do it?
Dan: It’s a great question and one that comes up often during initial conversations with our prospective customers. We find that customers are more curious as to the reasoning versus questioning the legitimacy.
We treat each engagement with a customer as if it were a legal proceeding. We find that our ideal customers really appreciate how sensitive we treat our collaboration with their company and their most senior stakeholders/leaders.
From a logistical standpoint, some customers reach out to us when they are trying to commercially mediate what appears to be a potential legal situation with an external vendor. 95% of the time, we can handle the situation via commercial negotiation. If the situation does require any sort of legal support or litigation, our team is ready to quickly support and collaborate with our customer’s legal team based on our strict confidentiality and document handling standards.
Moderator: Did your background in the FBI contribute to your decision on this approach?
Dan: {Laughing} Yes, I think it probably did. There were two things that I was taught immediately upon entering my FBI career: 1) Before you make any questionable decision, think about how the outcome of your decision would look on CNN the next morning and 2) Classified information is best protected on a compartmented, need-to-know basis.
While our entire team doesn’t come from an Intelligence Community background, everyone is provided training on the importance of confidentiality and the proper procedures for protecting client confidential materials. I can confidently say, without a doubt, that our customer data and processes are more secure than most multinational law firms.
Moderator: When you have prospective clients looking to speak with references, aren’t you afraid of losing potential business if you’re not willing to share your client portfolio?
Dan: You know the business owner in me honestly thinks about this a lot. From an actual data standpoint, we know that if a prospective customer chooses not to work with us, it’s primarily due to cost and not caused from the lack of reference calls.
Another fact that we’ve proven over the years is that 3 out of 4 clients request repeat or ongoing support, so any lost opportunity from this topic is naturally superseded with our repeat customer business. That’s how I would prefer it anyway, as taking on a new customer brings its own inherent risks… it’s a two-way street.
Moderator: How do you make clients feel comfortable working with you if they aren’t able to speak with references?
Dan: My answer on this is simple: Everyone has friends. Do you honestly think any salesperson, no matter what industry, is going to refer you to a client that has had a sub-optimal experience? I am a Strategic Sourcing Expert, and so is the rest of the Service Delivery Team. When we worked for large companies, we often were told to ask for references. However, whenever we received reference contact information, we rarely called them to validate. This reference gathering process is an old school purchasing process for process sake, and we find our best customers find more trust in the fact that we were ranked as the 2nd fastest growing company in Minnesota by Inc Magazine.
Moderator: What are some other benefits that might not be apparently obvious of keeping clients confidential?
Dan: Excellent question... This is a passionate topic of mine of which I could honestly discuss for an hour. In the interest of brevity, a few of the top benefits include:
Ease of Contracting – No Publication
Most of our clients are very large multinational organizations. The Marketing and Legal departments inside of these companies are naturally very protective and risk adverse (for good reason) of their name brand, logo, etc. Since our customer contracts don’t include any language regarding “publication,” it eliminates unnecessary administrative burden, and legal review cycles, on both sides of the transaction.
TNG Client Protection
Most of our clients request that TNG be a covert silent advisor in the background (instead of an overt legal agent of the company). This means that the supplier in which our customer is negotiating with should never have knowledge of our involvement. By keeping all clients confidential, we eliminate any risk of the supplier later discovering our involvement.
Deter Sales Snooping
Without going into too much detail here, just know that large software companies have an incredible amount of financial resources. They employ individuals to be assigned, or even sit in, your organization to learn everything there is to know about your company in the interest of upselling their products and services. This also includes learning as much as they can about what companies are using external advisors to benchmark rates, processes, etc.

7 Most Common Mistakes to Avoid When Negotiating Your Salesforce Agreement
We commonly get the question: “What are the most common mistakes and/or things to avoid when negotiating a Salesforce Agreement?” So much actually that we thought it made sense to write a short article for all to consume.
A Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform is commonly within the top 5 expenses within every CIO’s annual budget. The day-to-day operations of business serve as a natural distraction for all of us and, if you don’t negotiate contracts all day long, it’s near impossible to know all the information you need in order to successful prepare and execute a negotiation strategy. Negotiating a Salesforce contract is tricky and can be extremely complex. Don’t underestimate the time, effort, or expertise you’ll need, or you’ll quickly lose control of the entire deal.
Here are the 7 most common mistakes we find CIOs and IT Management Teams make when negotiating their Salesforce agreement:
1. Failing to prepare
While this may not come as a surprise, the single most common mistake is failing to allocate enough time, resources, and expertise to properly prepare for the negotiation.
Ask yourself this: Would you ever go to a car dealership and take the first car they offer without first doing your research on price, warranty, etc.?
As a CIO or IT management team, you should not make assumptions or rush through the process of finding and/or negotiating your CRM platform. No matter whether you are searching for a new CRM platform or simply renewing your existing agreement, make sure you take time to understand the business and digital capabilities you are looking to acquire and/or augment. Take time to conduct interviews across the organization and create a business canvas of those needs to create a simple viewpoint of the wants and needs of the entire organization.
We advise our clients to start 6 months prior to any anticipated contract execution date.
2. Failure to look at the bigger picture
We find CIOs, IT Management Teams, and Salesforce administrators are great at thinking about the relatively short-term needs of their organization but commonly forget to keep the big picture in mind. As with any strategic supplier relationship, you need to think about how the pricing, requirements, and relationship with Salesforce will look over the next 3-5 years. Instead of looking at the short term, think strategically about your organization's goals and the relationship you want to build. You need to approach your CRM vendor with a long term mindset. Look at how their services will be beneficial to your organizations in terms of growth and transformation. Make sure you prepare a compelling forward-looking strategy that is deliberate in identifying how the Salesforce relationship will benefit your business. It’s equally as important to understand how Salesforce views its relationship with you. Only after both sides understand the current state of each organization can it build a plan forward.
3. Focusing too much on price
Our clients are almost always surprised when we say this statement. While price is ultimately very important in any commercial agreement, it’s equally as important to validate that you have the proper products and services for your organization.
“Right Size for the Right Price” – Dan Kelly, The Negotiator Guru
If you’re a new customer, make sure you’re not overbuying at the start…remember, adoption always proves to be slower than you will anticipate when introducing a new CRM platform.
Subsequently, it’s all too common for the sales team to overweight your 1st year agreement as they are solely focused on capturing as much revenue as possible from your account.
If you’re an existing customer, conduct an internal audit of your products and services that are currently part of your Salesforce ecosystem. Make sure not only these products and services are being used (the easy part) but also that they’re being used appropriately. Very often we’ll find opportunities for our clients to downgrade while still achieving the same business functionality required.
4. Not considering all your options
It’s important to keep a pulse on the marketplace…there are multiple CRM platforms out there and while Salesforce is the industry leader they may not be the best fit for you.
Subsequently, if you are a current Salesforce user then it’s equally as important to conduct a deep dive assessment on how other peers in your industry are using Salesforce. A properly run CRM platform should not only optimize the sales process but also drive efficiencies in back office operations, etc. If you identify (and you most likely will) new areas where Salesforce can assist your business, carefully bring this up as an opportunity during the negotiation process. Again, we urge the word “carefully.”
5. Not developing Executive Level relationships
As written in previous articles, Salesforce has set-up its very own incredibly effective sales machine. While we won’t reiterate the previously written articles it’s important to call out that most Salesforce customers underestimate the importance of developing and engaging VP level and higher relationships at Salesforce. Only these levels have decision making authority on your account. If these individuals are on your side, and understand your story, you’ll be far more successful in your negotiation.
6. Failure to create a strategic internal communication plan (as part of your negotiation strategy)
Almost everyone fails at developing a bulletproof internal communication plan. While the saying “speak from one voice” is widely used and understood in negotiations, it’s not enough to simply rely on human beings to say exactly the same thing at the same time. Instead, we advise our clients to develop a communication plan that provides key talking points for different levels of the organization. These talking points all align to the same objective but are developing in a way that reinforce message authenticity for that specific stakeholder.
7. Neglecting to include your C-Level Executives in the negotiation
Related to the previous point, we find that the majority of organizations we advise have historically tried to limit and/or eliminate any C-Level interaction with Salesforce. This is naturally understandable (based on common thinking) but actually a serious mistake.
Salesforce takes great pride in, and places great importance on, developing relationships directly with their customer’s executive team.
We advise clients not to fight this point but leverage it. We admit that we used to get this point wrong ourselves. We used to ensure the C-Suite knew not to say anything and only redirect messages to a single point of contact. The big problem with this is that the c-suite really likes to talk! Instead of fighting this natural instinct (and skillset) we advise our clients to leverage it by creating a C-Suite communication and engagement plan that empowers the negotiation plan.

